Trump will not be able to deport Venezuelan using the Eighteenth Century Law: Reducing

The US Supreme Court prevented President Donald Trump on Friday The resumption of expulsion to Venezuelan immigrants For those who are accused of being members of a gang under the eighteenth century law.

In March, the Republican President protested the law of foreign enemies in 1798, which until then was used in times of war, to expel the alleged Venezuelan gangs members to a large group of El Salvador, which presented themselves to imprison them for money.

Trump accuses them of being members of the Aragua band, a “terrorist” global organization announced by Washington.

The Supreme Court, which consists of nine judges, three of them, intervened for the first time in this case on April 19 Deportation operations A summary of Venezuelan immigrants in an irregular position for El Salvador.

We recommend you: Does DHS make a “realistic offer” to give citizenship to immigrants? … the same and yes.

The administration resorted to the highest court to deport another group held in Texas (the south).

On Friday this failure 7 against 2, the judges prevented their plans because they appreciated that they did not give enough time to Challenge your expulsion.

The notification almost 24 hours before the expulsion, free of information on how to exercise legal procedures (…) does not meet the requirements. “He reads the opinion.

Hours after the court ruling, Donald Trump accused the Supreme Court of blocking his promises in his campaign on Friday after he was prevented from resuming the expulsion of Venezuelan immigrants using the eighteenth century law.

Trump said on the social truth platform, which is clearly angry.

The court “dictates only that the worst killers, two drug stores, gang members and even those who suffer from mental problems have entered our country illegally. They cannot be expelled Without going through a long and long legal process, which may take many years per person, which will allow them to commit many crimes before seeing the court.

The Republican President usually accuses immigrants without evidence that they are criminals and consider them criminals for entering the country without a visa or mandate. “This is a bad and dangerous day for the United States!” He concluded.

Trump

But the Supreme Court considers it “away from the conditions on the ground.”

Consequently, he returns the case to the fifth circle, the Court of Appeal, to determine whether it is use Foreign enemies lawIt is used in the past, especially to limit American citizens of Japanese origin during World War II.

He also asks him to prove the circumstances in which migrants can expose before the courts.

In order to be clear, we only decide today that the detainees have the right to notify the notification submitted on April 18, and we give us a temporary precautionary procedure, “they emphasize.

We recommend: Nine migrants die in the ice custody from Trump’s return to power.

On April 19, we do not address, and we do not do that now, the foundations of the parties’ allegations of the legitimacy of deportation “under the law of foreign enemies are determined.

Judges ask the minimum courts to address the case quickly because they realize “the importance of interests National Security From the government, “at the same time, the need to” be promoted according to the constitution. “

With AFP information.