Transition or retreat?

The desire of the first article of freedom, and going to the top of social perfection, is the madness of the child who tried to become an ideal man in one day.

Fray Servando Teresa de Mier

José Ortega Y Gasset had “courtesy” to make complex issues on hand. It deals with the concepts of simplicity and clarity that allow us to understand life and its effects. In a text written in 1942, he crosses:

The transition is so everything in history that history can be defined as the science of transition. Dialerance is a partial diagnosis, when it is not an insult that we dedicate to an era. In times that are called retreat, something is dissolved, but other things germinate.

Our first conference, which was held by Jose Maria Morelos and Buffon in 1813, to declare the independence of North America to the Spanish throne, produced two constituent documents: Apatzingán Constitution and Feelings of the nation. Point 12 of the last says:

Since good law is superior to every man, those who have been dictated by our Congress must be to the extent that they need returns and patriotism, moderate luxury and dismay, and in this way the wages of the poor are increased, which improves their habits that transmit ignorance, theft and theft.

For its part, Magna Carta expresses in Article 12: “These three authorities should not be practiced: executive, legislative and judicial, by one person or by one company.” He points to 24: “The happiness of people and each of the citizens consists of enjoying equality, security, property and freedom.” We defined the constitution in 1824 as a “popular representative.”

From these texts, we can conclude that, as a Mexican country, we have chosen an ambitious right; Any constitution, in addition to containing clear rules that must be applied, and therefore, its measurable compliance contains the software called So (or also called ads) that indicate purposes to achieve in the future and we must always follow them. Therefore, we are a city with a text that one day will have to reach. We are in a permanent transition process finally closing the real Mexico and Mexico’s legal gap. In our history, this gap was flexible, sometimes narrow, and for our families, it is expanded frequently until shed dimensions.

Therefore, after Ortega and Gasset, our history was transformations and decomposition.

Where are we today? Let’s start with the truth: we start another attempt in recent decades, to be an actor, democratic, federal and secular. The Mexican Revolution raised a transient political system, as the architects, who suffered from legitimacy and who had had the task of self -registration, reform without losing stability and finally their arrival at the Group of Nations by virtue of the original law.

The worsening presidency was dismantled and the foundations of fair electoral competencies were laid. We ignore civil culture. With naivety, we thought that with changing laws, established practices were defeated in social participation.

Relations were issued, power was distributed and the political class has not tolerated its obligations. We were all responsible, there was no democratic condemnation, or much less than the search for the public good. That was a surrounding and added. They won the most daring and bold to compete, and with the complexities of all species to anticipate power and kneading wealth. Those who have something they lose behave as usual, while giving priority for their own care.

In their right mind, no one can confirm that the continuity of good purposes is real. Decompression is a fact. Will he say what the Spanish philosopher said and in this circumstances also something? Just the time will say that.