The commentator CAIO COPOLLA, the lawyer and professor of constitutional law discussed Alyssandro Soares, on Monday (5), in The great debate (From Monday to Friday at 11 pm), the speech of Bahia’s ruler against the pockets.
In a speech during a agenda in the municipality of Joao Dorado, last Friday (2), Betista said former President Gear Bolsonaro (PL) Their voters were transferred to the “trench”.
Jerome Bolsonaro criticized the President’s performance at the time. “We had a president who smiled for those who were in the epidemic, and they felt a degree of breath.”
Copolla realizes that the ruler’s speech shows an incentive aspect of Bahia’s ruler. “Someone needs Bahia’s (ruler) that if he has access to evidence of any crimes committed during the epidemic, he has all the conditions that must be reported and request an investigation into the administration of former President Bolsonaro.”
For Alexandro Suares, the speech harms the most democratic wings on the left. The most violent tone of speech, according to him, is not part of what he preaches.
“If we get to the speech of former President Gere Bolsonaro, or the extreme right, this appearance, while referring to violence, in a more clear way, is already a common image. Even thinking that the ruler has apologized, who said he had been neglected, even in referring to the epidemic, still has a certain impact. Explain.
In response to Jerono Rodriguez’s statement, Deputy State, Landro de Jesus, from PL, he submitted an accountability against the ruler. In the document, the deputy notes that the phrase Jerome “refers to the practices of genocide and the mass violation of human rights, as it is not fully compatible with the assumptions of the rule of democratic law.”
Coppolla argue that this request is symbolic because it represents the opposition’s dissatisfaction in Bahia regarding the issue. “This is the rejection of the behavior, the position and speech of the governor of Betista,” he said.
Alessandro, on the other hand, is not believed that this episode generates a penalty for the crime of responsibility towards Jerônimo Rodrigues.
“I find it very difficult for the context. When we talk about a situation that a person can punish in the rule of law, and when we talk about dismissal and the crime of responsibility, we have to imagine that the penalty for losing the office appears only when there is a very dangerous position.”
