The geopolitical importance of wrapping

Stefano Lizshenski – Vatican City

Since Wednesday, May 7, the world has been his eyes on the Vatican Cyclallian chapel to attend the flavor that recently chose Liu fourteenth. Although it is correct that the presence of 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide does not justify such a statement, it is not true that all forces and foreign ministers in the world followed the electoral process for Boutros. In fact, the religious and spiritual leader of the International Church has not been chosen, but also the head of the Vatican City State, one of the smallest international lands in the world, whose weight in the community of states is huge.

Ethical power weight

“The moment of Confavia is an element that affects the global geopolitical context – Dario Fabri, director of Domino Domino Geographical Geographical Magazine – explains that the direct interest that the states showed in an attempt to tamper with the maneuver in favor of one candidate or another.” In addition, it is the same global dimension of the church, which is also expressed in the international origin of the CRAD, which tickles attempts to influence the electoral process.

“The only government that does not usually participate in these attempts is Italian,” says Fabbari. “

In all international fields, including the role of the world or regional organizations, the Vatican role has always been recognized as a decisive ethical power attributed to the papal state. It is sufficient to think about the current context of crises and widespread wars, which compared to a world war to parts.

From negotiating a return to Ukraine for children who were deported during the war, to condemn the massacres in the Middle East, it criticizes the economy that punishes the most fragile societies or supports all forms of cooperation publicly to protect creation, education and the political line of the prevailing Pope, or enhance or not enhance international balance.

Multiple context

“To be able to mediate and confuse the interests of the great powers, at the geopolitical level, the attribution of the state of the superpower, although there is a completely different nature from what we usually imagine – requires the domaino manager – and believes, both, the moral authority of the Vatican state under the French in light of the idea represented by the West somewhat in the good part of the package.”

The past decade has revealed what extent changed global geopolitical panorama, with a severe fragmentation of the political blocs that had previously governed the planet’s balances. This means that the actors capable of influencing international balances have also increased. If there is a multi -polar crisis in the field of international organizations, it is irony that the world of international relations is moving exactly in this direction. The position that greatly increases the expectations of governments before an event like Conclave.

“The frustrating hegemony stage we live in the church – and therefore the state of the Vatican – is more than before, because it can speak to all corners of the planet. Francisco understood it well: If the church remains western, it has no moral authority to invest in peace. ”

The geopolitical meaning of peace

It is exactly the “unarmed and armed” peace, as well as the ability to build bridges, the first software points of the new Pontificate from Leo XIV. “He focused on overcoming fences, overcoming differences,” Dario Fabbari says, and the geopolitical repercussions of this choice can only be considered an opportunity for the world by reaffirming the actor, the Vatican, who is able to mediate in the world -torn balance in the world and wars. “

The attention of governments towards choosing the intensity of Roman, which has witnessed hundreds of messages from good wishes from all over the world, is somewhat sealing the geopolitical weight to choose the Pope. In this case, the American Pope, but also Peru, in short, South America of remote European origins and multiplicity.

“Do not forget – Fabbberry – the symbolic value of the rapid choice somewhat in a context in which 133 Cardinals met from 70 different countries. Also from this point of view, it is a strong sign of the universal church’s ability to fold bridges through dialogue and boshia. ”