Professor and the poor Wálter Maierovitch made harsh criticism of the performance of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) in the ruling of the coup plan issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office. In your participation in the program Ww This Monday (24), Mayirovic said, “The Federal Supreme Court pretends to be exempt and Polsonaro pretends to be innocent.”
According to the law, the Supreme Court must act as best as possible, but it has taken doubtful decisions, such as limiting the defense period and transferring the suspension and comment questions analysis from separation to the plenary session. Maierovitch argues that these measures weaken the credibility of the ruling.
Confidence in evidence and prize -winning allegations prize
The teacher emphasizes the severity of the situation, with the presence of “proven evidence” and firm allegations of granting it confirmed by the testimonies of military leaders at that time. And it confirms that these reports support the receipt of the complaint, which indicates that this is not a foolish accusation.
Maierovitch also questions the exemption of some Stf, citing the case of Minister Alexander de Morris, who was mentioned in the complaint as a goal of a possible attack. Jurisprudence argues that, in normal situations, the person in this position had already formed a valuable judgment on the case.
Criticism of the process and the higher performance
The teacher also criticizes the change of basic legal concepts, such as the democratic state, broad defense and due legal procedures. The current situation is compared to the case of former judge Sergio Moro, and wondering whether the lessons of that episode are not learned.
Finally, Maierovitch argues that the highest should be clean and free ruling. However, he believes this will not happen, because the process already begins with suspicious ministers claiming to be in the wrong place, when it should happen in the first degree.
