Madrid provincial court released an elementary school teacher from a school USERA Who was determined Six crimes of sexual abuse For many of his students, for minors. According to the sentence issued on Monday, the room was released to the editor of the allegation that “the actions of the defendant did not prove that the mode of being described by the minority.”
At the oral investigation, the judges asked for evidence before the Madrid’s 32 -to -Advisory Court in a Gasel room with the judge and a psychologist. The minority said the teacher They touched the breasts in class When they went to the group, they lowered their hands around the waist, and to greet them, among other types of touch.
The facts will be Lungs for several months In that course and the children commented on them, they did not mention anything to their teachers or parents to be afraid, even though they were embarrassed. So,, The lawyer demanded 18 years in prison As for the teacher, the allegations raised the sentence for 27 and a year and a half. For its part, security has been requested to release its customer, although the damage is to be noticed and the unnecessary delay.
Visitors question its testimony
In this sense, the provincial court points out in his judgment on Monday that the minority is talking about touching the breast area, They are not accurate When it comes to what kind of place it is, some say that it is language and other natural, and if they occur in the last row, it is incredibly found that the first row student can find this accurately. “
So, the judges understand that There is no “trusted test” The teacher touched the students, and the teacher’s movement below the waist can simply respond to a better support when explaining the divisions for the child in the computer. ”
Besides, They question the testimony In students, “It is suspected that the teacher will have some sort of real touch, without prejudice for the big or less oom blacks that the child can feel the teacher’s intimacy.”
In the event of acts of accusations, the room considers that they would have been “clear sexual content or biased”, so they go to free the accused in using the principle of ‘Dupio Pro Rio’ (by suspicion, the accused is favorable).
