The federal government was sent to The National Congress proposed amending the General Security Constitution last Tuesday (8). One of the proposal pillars is to give the constitutional situation to the unified public security system, SUP, which was created in 2018 under ordinary law.
According to the Minister of Justice and Public Security, Ricardo Lewandowskiand The goal is to bureaucracy and give more efficiency to work all powers to combat criminal organizations.
Although the efforts of the public authorities in an attempt to reduce violence in the country and evaluate it are welcomed in PEC, the GETULIO VARGAS Foundation in São Paulo (FGV-SP) and a member of the Brazilian Public Security Forum (FBSP),,, Raphael AladebaniWith anxiety, the formation of the police in Brazil.
In an interview with CNNAlcadipani referred to serious problems in the police forces infrastructure and highlighted the shortcomings in preparing security factors and the need for structural changes in the sector.
“We see here, in Sao Paulo, that in the military police, the police benefit from the jacket. We see in the civil police that the formation of the police leaves a lot of desirable.”
Regarding PEC Public Security in general, Alcadipani evaluates that the proposal can be seen in two ways. “We can look at PEC through full glass or empty glass. With regard to empty glass, it is more than the same, there are no big innovations, and you have no big changes, and we do not suggest the police repair,” criticized the FGV teacher.
Political expression and elections
Alcadipani realized the symbolic importance of political expression on this issue, but stressed that this movement is linked to the electoral evaluation. He criticized both the opposition and the situation because they provide visions that are weak in this matter.
“How long have we not seen such a symbolism of this, as they appear (ministers, deputies and a member of the Senate) minimal concern about the problem, which is an important problem?
Professor FGV-SP concluded by expressing doubts about the possibility of thinking about politicians in a way that exceeds elections when dealing with the issue of public security. “It will be great to think after the elections, but the possibility of this happens is very low,” he said.
