Jeremy Vargas’s father was sentenced to four years in prison for sexual abuse of a former partner’s minor daughter

Los Palmas Visitors have been sentenced to father Yaremi VargasMissing Baby neighboring in 2007 (Gran Kanaria) Because sexually abusing a former friend’s daughter, He lived on those dates on the island Fuertevenura. The victim is 12 years of age during events.

Judgment condemns Vargas for staying Seven years away from the victim, Once the imprisonment is completed, compensate for 3,000 euros and see in the free environment for four years. Therefore, Juan Francisco Vargas, 40, one day when his partner and child slept together, the defendant Took a hand from the woman to touch the genitals, “Without the cost of finding this body part.”

Mom didn’t feel because she got up from sleep and not in the room. It is needed for the court The little girl got off the bed to see what was going on Also, a week later, she warned his older sister, their mother.

The judges consider these facts to be a crime of sexual abuse for a child under the age of 16, according to the 2015 Criminal Code, which applies to the time of facts. “It’s a The crime of sexual occupationIn small 16 years, without using violence or intimidation “, according to the 2022 legal reform.

During the trial, Vargas tried to claim that he was killed for a “conspiracy” warned by his former partner’s family Denied what victim to events. However, forensic psychologists do not appreciate any struggle in it.

For the audience, “There is no reason to assume that the story is a bizarre and wrong act,” They are not “reasons to disable or weaken the credibility of testimony.” “The achievement is the need to be considered reliable and trusted to the child’s story and that the described is completely reliable or acceptable.

As for the version of Vargas on why he was condemned, the room “is understood in accordance with the situation of the accused, but There is no strength per Se To spend the validity of the version Provided by the child. “

In court, the sexual offense committed in the case is “not only in the absence of approval, but also inappropriate than the age of the affected minor.” “As well as Use because of the active thing of the clear environment of his superiority The victim was derived from his descent on trust and family peerhood, ”he further says.