Ireland’s Taoseech, Michael Martin, has expressed his profound concern in the increasingly hostile tone of political discourse in Europe and the United States, which is the reason for the increase in the aggression of social networks.
“At this time, wherever you go, I am very worried about the raw material of the language in Ireland,” Martin told Eurneus.
“More and more social networks have made it easier. This kind of hateful talk. If you do not accept their opinion, label people and pilgrims.”
“As we do now, the ability to discuss, is quickly disappearing from the public sphere, and it is worrying me,” the Irish Prime Minister said.
Martin, who paid attention to Hungary, criticized the rhetoric from Budapest, sometimes harmful.
“I see a portion of the rhetoric emanating from the Hungarian government to Europe.” We will conquer Europe, or we will capture them.
Martin warned that this language could be “very negative” in public opinion.
Hungary Prime Minister Victor Arban, aimed at preventing EU decisions on Ukraine, was aimed at his criticism of expansion and European Peace Support Fund (EPF), a key tool for the European Union to provide military assistance to Ukraine in the defense of Russian invasion.
Martin expressed his alert for his consideration of fundamental rights throughout the European Union, and criticized Arbon “for abuse of veto,” to prevent the results of Ukraine.
Ireland, as a neutral country, contributes to the EPF, though not supplying weapons to Ukraine. Considering important EPF delays, EU countries have sought bilateral weapons transfers. For example, Ireland is recently related to Lithuania, which creates anti -lodging for Odesa schools.
Martin accused the European Union of using the European Union, and reiterated his support for the use of Section 7, which could suspend the right to vote of member states if the rule of law continues.
“People are using veto instructions,” he says. “In my opinion, is unfair.”
Hungary prevents Ukraine’s progress in the effort to paste with the European Union and often condemns the political and military support of the West. Instead, Dublin is one of the most partially partial EU capitals of the expansion and supports the adhesion of Ukraine.
Martin says, “What is happening now is ferocious. In my opinion, it is necessary to become a member of the EU for geopolitical reasons Ukraine,” says Martin.
“Europe has made many attempts to open them. Similarly, the European Fund for Peace has reduced the contribution of Ireland to Ukraine.”
AdvertisementThe evolution of Ireland’s role in European security
As the European Union faces the changing security panorama, debates on security and cooperation are intensifying, including generally obligatory plans to fund shared safety requirements.
Martin gave a rational view of whether Ireland support this approach.
“As for the Multifinano -structure, I think we are accepting the inevitable that there will be a part of the security requirements that will be a part of security requirements,” he said.
“Based on the needs of Ireland, it is not interested in uniting the path of other countries. If the Russian invasion of Ukraine is given, its existential sense to be preserved, which has changed the entire security precedent in Europe.”
AdvertisementAlthough it maintains its traditional neutral policy, Ireland is further participating in European security initiatives.
Martin pointed out the impact of the country in areas such as cyber security and the protection of submarine cables, basic to communication and data flows.
“Ireland is aware of its impact on cyber security and the safety of submarine cables, which is why it participates in many Pesco projects (permanent structured cooperation),” he explained.
