Last Wednesday (2), Federal Deputy PSD-BAThe introduction to acting against Glauber Braga (Psol-RJ) In the Parliament Ethics Council, he voted in favor of canceling the mandate of his colleague.
Soon after the course presents his opinion, the deputy Chico ALENCAR (PSOL-RJ)Request the viewpoint of the operation – more time for analysis – from the process, which should be resumed only next week.
In April 2024, Glauber and an influential free Brazil (MBL), which was determined as Gabriel Costannaro, were discussed inside the house. at that time , Costanaro deputy was expelled from the building with tremors and kicks. The confusion was pulled to the street (Watch the video below).
Representation was presented against Parliament last April by the new party. It argues the illustrations that Glauber threatened to attack a MBL member if he tries to enter the supplement again.
In yesterday’s session in the Ethics Council, the decision claimed that the PSOL deputy batch and kick it proved videos and that Costenaro did not interact, and he had been beaten outside the home headquarters.
According to Polo Majelis, the assault was also done
The course said: “The evidence in these records revealed a practice by representing the procedure that is incompatible with the parliamentary decoration. A member of Congress is required to adopt unbearable behavior, because the public interest does not accept slipping into his performance.”
“Given the evidence produced in the file, it seems that the actors (Glauber Braga) have denounced the rights of the state, and thus the abuse of the powers he has. (…) is a clear collapse of parliamentary decorations.
What does Glipper Braga say?
Psol stipulates that an MBL activist had a history of provocations against him, which culminated in his mother’s crimes.
Throughout the Wednesday session, Glauber said it is “angry”, but with “the calm heart”.
He spared no real estate criticism in the case and accused former mayor Arthur Lira (PP-Al) of being the true author of the opinion that Paulo Magal revealed.
“The course, in his despair that he is able to satisfy who already wrote the report, did not hide. What I said on that day, a deputy, and what I repeat here today, is the one who wrote his report is Mr. Arthur Lira.”
What happens now?
The Paulo Magalhães report should be voted in the next session of the Ethics Council, with no date for a date. If the opinion is approved, it goes to the plenary session of the house, which will give the last word on this topic.
In order to cancel the GLABER mandate, at least 257 votes (the absolute majority) need to vote.
(With information from the house agency)
