Doctors refuse to cut off a pregnant woman in brain death until the embryos are born

30 -year -old Nurse Adriana Smith, who was waiting for her second child, was announced with a brain death on February 19. Since then, her body has been linked to a respiratory tract at Georgia Hospital, not for medical reasons, but legal: According to their families, doctors informed them of it. State Law related to abortion inspires them to keep it in support of life Until the embryo develops enough.

The law of questionable, one of the most restricted in the country, was recognized in 2019 and came into effect after the Row and the verdict. Wade. Prohibits the abortion from the moment the fetal function is detectedSomething that can happen quickly during the sixth week of pregnancy. In his writing, he recognizes the fetus as a legitimate person, which has created complex legal and ethical circumstances like Smith, in which a woman’s lifeless body becomes a compulsory “incubator”.

Smith’s mother denounces The family is separated from medical resultsWithout voice about his daughter’s fate or firmly about the health of the fetus. “We do not know if it is born with defects,” he says on the open Gofantme to collect funds. This case has updated the debate on the legal personality of the fetus, which is a concept, which is promoted by anti -insurance groups, which prefer to guarantee legal rights from conception, but it also divides into the conservative movement.

History also focuses Racial inequality in accessing medical service. Smith, a black woman and a health expert, went to the hospital with headaches, but was sent home with drugs. A few hours later, her partner made her unconscious. This kind of negligence is not an event: several studies reveal that the symptoms of black women are less seriously taken, which contribute to the three -fold maternal mortality rates of white women in the United States.

While his body is constantly used to keep the fetus alive, his family face a mountain of medical, legal and economic questions. It is unclear who spends the months of life support or what the child is waiting for the future. There are no medical determination: there are no clear protocols for these cases and the long -term use of respirators can affect fetal development. As for experts, this case is rudely illustrating the legal void around the image of the fetus and the human consequences of legalism without thinking about exceptions.