The Cadarroja Judge, who leads the criminal case for managing Dana in Valencia, left the personality of the people’s union Cure hands This is because a lawyer representing this company is responsible for the safety of the former autonomous emergency secretary and in this process, Emilio Argiso. In a statement issued on Monday, this has made it public to the High Court of Valencian community, agreed to return to the organization of the depositary bond.
The magistrate explains in the resolution that the company will act as a popular allegation against the second place of the then Justice and Home Minister Salom Pratas. Harmless“. He reaches that decision because Arciso Jose is protected by Maria Pue Cotton sanchez-. He defined himself in an interview for a newspaper “Reference lawyer“And” the head of the legal services of that organization “.
“Criminal activities can never be used properly.
Deny the actions of the Forata Dam
In another statement, the magistrate confirms his decision Deny the request for research activities Made by a particular charge regarding the Forada Dam. He points out that this infrastructure does not affect the flood of the flow Barrenko del Booo Therefore, this is not related to the death of relatives of the deaths represented by the area.
“All killed are representing the appeal in the Biborda and Catarroja, so, in relation to the Poio Valley or its sub -rivers, they do not affect any prey,” the judge says in his summary. “It is understandable that it was stressed at an early moment in these issues but to lead the progress of the investigation Reject the tests Even with the simple geographical location of the dams and valleys, the simple assumptions that contradict them, in terms of pulos or fantasy situations, “he added.
It refuses to investigate maritime rescue operations
In the third note, the instructor has denied the testimony of the Chairman of the Chairman of the Control Tower of the Airport of the Airport Maritime recoveryBecause they believe that they are violating, “in the explicit way of the object of the hearing.”
According to the judge, “It is impossible to evaluate each of the potential recovery activities that can be carried out as a landscape and airplane, especially the lack of warnings, but for the population, but for the population. Even to other officers and security forces and bodies. “
These testimonies were claimed by the allegation that you were missing, based on the fact that a maritime rescue helicopter could not join the bail until October 30.
