Candidates to take over the triple luck

Twenty -eight from 637 candidates for judges and the judge Judicial, legislative and executive authority.

These applicants are 4.4 % of the total, while these cases represent 2.86 %, or 98 from three thousand 422.

Some are currently responsible in Ministry of Legal Law in MexicoSome were a judge in the cases in which some of the high character of Maurina participated and another wrote a book on 4T.

One of those issues with Triple Luck is those of lawyer Maria Guadaloubi Evaristo Lopez, a judge candidate on family matters specialized in national and international adoption, and a militant from Mourina, according to the registry of the militants in that party in the city of Mexico at the National Poor Institute (I).

Evaristo López has a teacher and a law teacher from the Faculty of Law at UNAM and was an assistant professor and researcher at the UNAM Legal Research Institute.

Another profile released in Three Tooms is the lawyer Mario Vega Heareta, a candidate for the Labor Party and Maurina court.

Juan Carlos Reese Torres, a candidate for the Judicial Disciplinary Court, who was opposed by the three authorities, has a law certificate from the American University of Iberro, a judge in the Auxiliary Chamber in the field of serious administrative responsibilities and the second additional room of CDMX.

Reese Torres is composed of the book To understand 4T On February 10, in a column published in a national newspaper: “Lopez Obrador has transformed the social and political relations of Mexico, he concluded his government with a high approval rate, and remains admired and loved by the majority of the population.”

In these cases, Lawyer Claudia Agilar, the ENI organization – which seeks to enhance women’s representation in politics – consider: “At the federal level, there are candidates who have been assumed by the three powers, but they do not control some cases. They cannot rise much.

The most dangerous thing about this (…) is that part of the indifference of nationality (before the judiciary is elected) is that the judges have been previously identified from the powerful, that is, those who are in voting, who will be able to choose between A, B or C, because they are already chosen for us, because they approach power or cases. “

In contrast, Mourina’s seat spokesman in the local Congress, Paulo Garcia, explained: “I think the main factor at the time of elections is that in voting, there will be no party sign (…) and the one in any other partners has been.

Pan Diego Garrido, who was part of the Special Committee for the Operation Choose Judges and Judges in the Judicial in Mexico, considered that judges who have a prominent affiliation will “really will not be neutral when cases reach their hands, but they return to the presence of a political group, to a political group promoted by their correspondents, and will be in steam.

If they want the judiciary to remain independent, then both political parties and citizens interested in these elections must grant both the National Electoral Institute and the Electoral Institute of the city of Mexico to challenge these candidates. “

In this regard, Morenta Paulo García’s deputy commented that “in other points where the drafting of the constitution is not clear, the electoral court may intervene to explain it.

Obviously, we will comply with the decision, but this is not fixed, as there may be isolated cases of Morina fighters or other parties, which must be reviewed as well. “

The lawyer agreed to the importance of reviewing these cases, “Because we cannot forget that 80 % of the things that are being tried are from the local judicial jurisdiction.

In addition, when reviewing the INE record, it was noticed that there are at least 29 candidates for the judges who are militants in Maurina.

We recommend: Fisel announces a list of complaints from the judicial elections

CVA