The Federation’s Prosecutor (AGU) explains an opinion to determine the criteria for the performance of the wife of the wife of the Republic in national and international events, where the first lady or the first room represents the head of state and the government.
The goal is to give legal certainty so that the partners of the Brazilian presidents can work as a “symbolic actor” in national and international matters.
The study is based on the performance of rulers from other countries. AGU believes that a lack of legal basis opens a breach so that there are questions and procedures in court.
This is the case of President Louise Insio Lula da Silva (PT). Rosângela Da Silva, Janja, It was the subject of questions in the Federal Audit Court (TCU) and the Public Prosecutor’s Office (PGR) due to a trip to the opening of the Olympic Games in France.
The same thing happened with The first lady’s trip to Rome. The case was submitted. And recently, it was a new trip to Paris again the subject of work by the opposition.
AGU’s study has two central goals. The first is to provide the legal certainty of the unpaid work for the husband (the first lady or the first hall) of the President of the Republic in the situations in which its activity is an undeniable public interest.
The second is to give more transparency in the accountability related to this activity, and to expand social control over the information related to the topic
One of the main assumptions of analysis is that in a democratic country, it is necessary to have a clearer definition about the president’s president’s role in public administration.
The opposition leader in the House of Representatives, Vice Zucco (PL-RS), said that AGU’s decision to clarify this view now highlights the lack of clarity and the previous organization of the role of the first lady. “Something we were already warning. It is necessary that there be transparency and respect for the Republican principles, ensuring that there is no agent or public person linked to government actions without the appropriate accountability towards society.”
