India and Pakistan agreed with an immediate ceasefire on Saturday (10), boycotting the worst fighting in decades between neighbors with a nuclear arsenal as the attacks seemed to leave control.
Although US President Donald Trump, He was the first to announce the ceasefire The author claimed, India and Pakistan submitted contradictory reports on the extent of the United States participating in the agreement.
A few hours after the announcement, There were reports of violations on both sidesRise questions about its duration.
How did the armistice come?
Before nine in the morning (Brazilian time), 17 hours in India and Pakistan, Trump announced a ceasefire at a post on the social network.
“After a long night of negotiations that take place in the United States, I am pleased that I announced that India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire,” Trump said.
Soon after, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that India and Pakistan have not only agreed with a ceasefire, but also “they started negotiations on a large group of issues in a neutral position.”
Rubio said that the ceasefire happened after he and Vice President JD Vance spent the last two days speaking to high -ranking employees from both countries.
A minute later, Pakistan confirmed that the ceasefire entered into force immediately. The Indian confirmation came shortly after.
The Ministry of Information in India stated that the agreement was prepared “directly between the two countries”, which reduces the participation of the United States and the contradiction of Trump’s statement. The ministry also stated that “there was no decision” to maintain new negotiations.
The Pakistani authorities praised Washington.
“We thank President Trump for his leadership and pre -emptive peace in the region,” Prime Minister Shehabz Sharif said.
A Pakistani source said he is familiar with the negotiations CNN The United States – and Rubio, in particular, was essential to achieving the agreement, as it drew a panorama of negotiations that were in doubt until the armistice confirmation.
Different reports
It should not be surprised that these competitors submitted contradictory reports on how to fulfill the ceasefire.
According to analysts, India, which is a superior power, has long resisted international mediation, while Pakistan, which is heavily dependent on external aid, tends to welcome it.
“India has never accepted mediation in any conflict, either Pakistani India or India, or anything else,” said Dr. Abarna Bandy, a researcher in India and South Asia at the Hudson Institute.
He added, “Pakistan, on the other hand, has always sought international mediation, so it will praise it,” saying that it is “the only way to pressure India to discuss and resolve the conflict in Kakimira.”
The fighting before the ceasefire was distinguished on Saturday by allegations, anti -attacks and wrong information on both sides. Now that the conflict stops, both sides are increasing their efforts to form perceptions about what the battle achieved and how it has ended.
