Viani Esquinca-Libres, but with Korea

• Mexico did not win. Mexico simply did not lose … a lot.

Only April appeared, and as it was a new resurrection on Sunday, in Mexico, the mass Baloui was released. Because, again, Donald Trump He announced a mutual package of the customs tariffs of the world, and miraculously, Mexico was excluded. The country was saved! Absolutely released! Its diplomatic classification, T-MEC and good offices of the authorities! As a good concert, it was held as if it were the World Cup, the Academy Award for Best Foreign Film and the Nobel Prize in Economics, all in one day.

Few wanted to read the small message from the advertisement and there are details, the saint of politicians says, Kantinfla. While the news assumed that “Mexico, not the Libra”, the fact is that this freedom was only for the definitions and mutual products that comply with the rules of the treaty. The rest, everything that does not qualify, is not approved, or does not have the sacred stamp of T-MEC, will pay a 25 % tariff-which is supposed to reach 50 % of imports to the United States-as well as 25 % on steel and aluminum, and of course 25 % on auto parts manufactured outside the United States, and the percentage of the Mexican government trying to reduce this way.

That is, the country is free, but with Korea. They call the country, but with GPS, they forgive their commercial lives, but under the word that the government is acting well in everything else; It is like someone who leaves the prison with an electronic bracelet.

Mexico did not win. Mexico simply did not lose … a lot. Because although the generalized punishment was avoided, which should not be bargaining, something preferred to ignore has been confirmed: the economy is still linked to the dental thread with Washington’s spirit, and that an important part of exports is not armored through the tripartite agreement. What is worse, there is a stormy clouds on the treaty that is now a shield of economics.

But who is concerned that it is among the conservatives, legislators and commercial cameras to coincide with themselves because they are not in the blacklist? The official narration, as well as the informal narration, turned into singing into understanding, into dialogue, into the diplomacy of hugs. Nobody means that the customs tariff is still paid for hundreds of products or that the most vulnerable sectors can be the most defeated.

No one will enter these youngs because the joke is to see everything pink, although the White House document is written in red ink. Nappel narration does not need reality: it only needs a press conference, a beautiful position, and some flags waved in the background, and of course a wonderful event that combines cream, generous politics and the business sector.

If something shows this episode, it is that Uncle Sam does not need to build walls if he can put rates and that in Mexico it is sufficient to say: “The matter did not go badly, we have a preferential treatment” so that he feels as if the country was a global power. The discounts in growth expectations and pessimistic expectations of investors are not enough to operate the warnings. This is only part of the neoliberal discourse that does not want to see 4T victory.

In this country, diplomacy is measured by the number of mutual congratulations, and not through the concrete benefits of the productive sectors. Meanwhile, young exporters who do not qualify to get the golden seals of T-MEC will push the consequences of institutional optimism. This does not click, does not like it, much lower points in investigative studies.