The fourth section of the provincial court of Valencia maintains the processing of former Conlara and Exportavas, Dell Botnic, Monica Oldra14 more, high positions and technicians of their department Oldra’s former Husband is said to be hiding abuse for a small guardian. However, he agreed to dismiss the case for the former Regional Director of the Equality Department and Valencia Carmen Penolosa in Castelon, and he assumed that his participation in these facts was limited to a group, and this court is already obviously excluded from all criminal relations.
This is stated in a resolution dated May 9, in which the room rejects Resources filed by six senior posts in the Ministry At the time, the Oldra operated against the car, in which they all agreed to process them. This is part of the case by creating an information file once the matter is already being prosecuted, in order to determine the truth of the allegations made by the minority.
By this decision, the trial admits the appeal of Penolosa to understand it Its combination in the processing car is an illustration error. His intervention in the facts as of December 2019 – he invited the regional direction of Valencia a month ago – the fact that the “third volume” or “third episode” of the facts was limited, which in June 2024, the room was explicitly excluded from all criminal matches “. These facts refer to the time of oral test celebration against the educator for abuse and “the truth about the behavior of the little little ones for the investigation”, so this is not provided on his processing day.
On June 20 last year, in charge of the case, Valencia’s 15 instruction court issued an order to change the previous proceedings in a brief procedure. He did it in the use of the fourth section of Valencia’s audience, which was reopened just days before the reason Evaluate the resources of the specific indictment Five years in prison for abuse and two famous accusations-Vox and Governor-De-Sangam. The hearing understood that the existence of “clearly” criminal offense can be “clearly” and “clearly” and that the “sufficient signs” attended.
This procedure, which was operated against Oldra – resigned from its posts after his judicial inquiry in June 2022, and 15 others had previously registered the same instruction number 15 without praising any crime or a method of abuse. The decision was supported by the Attorney’s Office. However, after the “credible” hypothesis, the audience preserved, when the news of abuse came to the Ministry of Equality, “Those who have knowledge of facts and whose safety and guardian are younger. They would have wanted to hide them.”
In that re -ability, the court understood it “None of the strict facts from the junior guardian have been reported or not protected Since the educator who had been abused was reunited with his work in the reception center, it was a duty to do so by putting it in a dangerous situation. “
Therefore, he estimated that it could not be rejected in a “clear way” at that point, and it was obtained from violating the duty to condemn the small guardian if the Criminal Investigation Authority had to be condemned. He thought the purpose was to cover up the presence of sexual abuse at the reception center. He also understood that it should be active Oral testing that makes the complications clarify The facts are associated with specific circumstances taken to the qualified regular judgment.
“The right to blame”
A message on the social network with the following phrase in Valencian, after knowing the decision, wrote the export of Gonzelrera and Consul: “Tread to the charge” (the right to blame) He also added Bernardo Queen Bernardo Queen “Graphic Imadge” (Graphic Figure) by the Umberto Environmental Environment.
According to the sources of its environment, it refers to the use of the room First to “act” “It exists the right to blame against guessing innocent, which is used in administrative law, but not in fine.”
Valencian community (D) Valencia (D) Valencia.
Story Credit