Trump can remove migrants his right to defend themselves if they are arrested

The government of the US President Donald Trump “Think seriously” about the p.Usedind the person’s right to challenge Before his arrest, a high position of the White House was reported on Friday, in a full counter attack.

Trump considers that the country suffers from a “invasion” and promised to expel millions of migrants in an irregular situation, which he calls “criminals” to enter without a visa or permission.

But the migrant measures adopted by its administration since his return to the White House in January, especially their accelerating expulsion operations, faced Many courts refused Among the judges who request the legal procedures due to migrants.

The White House explores anger, and explores other ways to avoid legal brakes.

We recommend: Trump will spend a thousand dollars for each immigrant in order to obtain self.

The deputy director of the White House Policy, who told the journalists that the constitution is clear, and of course, is the supreme law of the country, by proving that the privilege of an appeal in front of the body can be suspended in the event of an invasion.

“So it is a choice to think seriously,” he added. “This is largely dependent on whether or not the courts are doing the right,” he said.

“The body of beauty” It is a legal guarantee that requires the appearance of a person being held in front of the judge to determine whether his detention is legal.

The “ideal body” of the government can allow the government to reach individual expulsion procedures and accelerate deportations, but almost certainly this procedure will end in the court and perhaps before the Supreme Court.

In the United States, it was rarely suspended, as during the civil war in the period from 1861 to 1865 and after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor EN 1941.

We recommend: he was deported by Trump seeking to start Mexico.

The Republican President conjured up the law of foreign enemies in 1798, which until then is used in times of war, to send members of the alleged Venezuelan gang in Aragua to a large group in El Salvador.

A federal judge was considered in Texas “illegal” President Trump’s use of this law from the eighteenth century.

The Supreme Court and several federal courts were temporarily paralyzed by virtue of this rule, claiming that immigrants must have the opportunity to challenge their legally expel them before the courts.

With AFP information.