The Senate has stabbed the INE agreement, which is approved by the procedures that must be followed to verify that the candidates for fees in the extraordinary electoral process of the judicial authority may participate in the Federation 2024-2025 in crimes, and in the next few hours, they will constitute another challenge with the names of the candidates who consider them to be elected by the population.
The challenge was presented on Monday, April 28, and indicates the INE agreement, which proves that the candidates will be reviewed for the union’s judicial branch They do not bear the cases of constitutional article 38, in their numbers V, VI and VII, in reference to “fugitive from justice, where the arrest order is issued until the criminal procedure is described.”
To “the death penalty that imposes a penalty to suspend the rights of citizens and powers, and to sentence the firm imprisonment for the deliberate committee for crimes against integrity and body; Against sexual freedom and security, psychological, natural, sexual development; For domestic violence, equation, or domestic domestic violence, violation of sexual privacy; On the political violence of women, in any kind of sexes.
You can read: Open educational gaps
monitoring
The Senate argues that “While the National Electoral Institute is correct, it is the highest body responsible for organizing and electoral operations, It is clear that he must have a vigilant role. In this sense, the disputed agreement is not established and motivated by not ensuring that you are able to verify the requirements of suitability.
The nature of the basic law granted to the right is related to the legal interest protected by the law, so that the basic goods are then in the presence of a basic right.
It is claimed that the disputed agreement, according to which the eligibility requirements are verified for the extraordinary electoral process 2024-2025 to choose various positions of the Federation’s Judicial Authority 2024-2025, and is estimated that it is unconstitutional and uncomfortable and illegal. Since this stage was firm according to the electoral principle of determining the stages, “he says.
Remember that “the Supreme Chamber of the Electoral Court of the Federation’s Judicial Authority has realized that the evaluation committees cannot be requested to return to a stage that has already crowned.
The evaluation committees of the three authorities of the Union were combined to receive inscriptions, evaluate the requirements and suitability, and prepare lists of best evaluated persons, softly, send broken lists to the authority that represents each authority to approve and send them to the Senate. Accordingly, the evaluation committees ended its constitutional committee in the date in which it carried out the general correction, and thus sent the list of people who were strengthened to the Senate and this after the National Electoral Institute. “
He asks that “the agreement that is stabbed must be left without influence, and the electoral administrative authority must wait at the appropriate procedural moment for a possible confirmation of the extent of nominations for nominations.”
Here you can access the news in real time
Learn the most viral in Facebook is heading
Read the book of columns from EXCélsior opinion
Clm
(Tagstotranslate) Judicial Elections (T)
Story Credit