On July 10, 2023, the worker M Farewear when receiving a letter of production reasoning: M. Closing service offices. He has been working at this cleaning center for over 17 years. The cleaning company said He worked at another company that had changed his offices on July 5.
Once the dismissal is obtained, Worker M. Presented a compromise ballot for mediation, arbitration and compromise service (SMAC)Expresses your disagreement with redundancy. On July 28, a compromise law was held, resulting in a contract.
They shoot him and he accepts the solution but then condemns the company: justice is right for the worker
No agreement, The worker filed a suit for unristed dismissal before the Social Court Madrid’s No. 42, which proved him in the June 4, 2024 judgment.
Social Court declared to be dismissed and demanded that the company “Read the plaintiff at her work And The same conditions of managed before dismissal, In this case the wage is implemented at the rate of € 27.49/day, or compensates for it at 4 17,450.83.
They shoot him and he accepts the solution but then condemns the company: justice is right for the worker
Read
Corporation It appealed, but Madrid’s High Court dismissed the appeal in January 2025 and confirmed that it was impossible to dismiss.
Justice has recognized the real antiquity since 2006, and that too The company did not justify the dismissal or properly paid compensation. In addition, the worker can choose 17,450.83 euros between reading or receiving more compensation.
