They condemn an ​​insurer to pay almost a million euros for a patient’s death

Sixth section of the provincial court Bontevra The first case has confirmed the judgment of the court of 3 Wiko And has condemned Sanitas Pay nearly a million euros to a patient’s death It should not be directed. In 2017, the insurer should compensate for the widow and the dead of the deceased at the age of 62, and 470,330 euros are more than half a million for the main and insurance contract law.

The first event was decided that there was a bad medical procedure that caused the patient’s death. It was determined that the surgery was injected Diverticular disease is not justified by suffering.

In addition, the surgical investigation was recognized, and if the patient knew the chirosis, he finally contributed to his death and would not have directed it. However, The disease was not diagnosed before interventionConsidered to be a special responsibility of the doctor.

Clear signs of Livopathi are not taken into account, and experts agree with it Surgery may be avoided or postponed to perform tests that reject chirosis. In conclusion, the first event judgment argued that surgery should never be performed without the full information or clear permission of the patient, and affects that if death is not carried out, it may not occur.

According to the medical history he has elaborated, the provincial court decides that the patient has knowledge of the surgeon Suffering from chronic liver disease, According to radioactive tests carried out between 2013 and 2016, he adds to the imprisonment, but he did not require new evidence to confirm the evolution of the disease before the surgery was contradicted in the events of liver chirosis.

This omission that contributed to the patient’s death, the court argues, “Had a young non -medical history because the conditions were not weightless”. In addition, it is not considered that information on the risks of the procedure or informed approval is valid so that the patient’s health status is not properly confirmed.

The provincial court indicates the first event judgment It properly assessed the medical responsibility. The verdict of the Provincial Court is appealing before the Supreme Court.