On Tuesday (8), the US Supreme Court made a positive decision for the Trump government and allowed the administration not to reject thousands of federal officials.
UN -minimal American courts assess whether they are the Republican efforts Discounts in the public machine is legal, This is the latest victory for the White House in court, which has a majority.
This measure prevented the request of the minimum court judge, who demanded the government to reintegrate more than 16 thousand employees in the test (experience period) from Trump government He tries to shoot in many agencies.
In the brief decision, among only two paragraphs, the court states that the unions that submitted the request are not legitimate for this process.
However, the current decision is not the last word on whether employees will be able to maintain their jobs, but it will have a significant impact on both workers and agencies at this time.
Sonia Sotomior and Kitanji Brown Jackson, two liberal judges, said they voted publicly to deny the union’s request.
Jackson gave a brief explanation, interrogating the highest higher need to treat the topic.
The full effects of the decision are unclear, because a federal judge in Maryland issued a judicial order earlier this month. He re -merged some employees who have not been covered in this case into the Supreme Court.
Steve Vladik, Supreme Court analyst from CNN A professor at the Grand Town Law Center said that the decision was relatively limited.
“All the court said here is that the non -profit organizations that obtained a judicial order in San Francisco were not the correct parts to contact collective coordinates,” he said.
He added: “It is another victory for Trump, but only again with regard to those who can prosecute, in which the courts have led. Other challenges in the fact that the collective workers already have already to decisions against the government in other cases, and this remains valid.”
However, the decision was a victory for the Trump government, which asked the Supreme Court to interfere in the case and rejected the minimum court order.
In your efforts to reduce civil service, Trump’s government aims In the test (experience period) because they have less protection than work and can be launched more easily.
Although these employees cannot challenge their separation, they can do so if the procedure is due to “party reasons for the party” or “marital status”.
In this case, unions and other groups were stabbed in the role of the US Personnel Management Office (OPM), the main human resources agency in the US federal government in the demobilization of workers, which influenced thousands of employees and sent shock waves to various federal agencies, some of which later on workers.
Judge William Alsup ordered the government “immediately” to reject more than 16,000 stages in the testing stage.
“Each agency (and still has) had a power to employ and reject its employees,” Alsup wrote in his opinion.
“Here, the agencies were directed by OPM to reject all employees to prove, and to perform this guideline principle. To stop damage that could not be compensated on the applicants illegally cutting the team from other agencies, it was necessary to reintegrate these employees immediately,” he wrote.
But Trump frams the case as another example of the federal judiciary, which interferes with the decisions that he should be left to the executive authority.
“The unusually wide treatment of the provincial court now causes continuous and unaccodible damage to the executive authority, which justifies urgent intervention of this court,” Sarah Harris, which was then the interim government of the government.
