The Senate will allow nomination. I wanted to replace its jobs

The Senate Council for the Republic has gave up the positions of the National Electoral Institute (I) in verifying the health of the candidates for judges, judges and ministers to the Supreme Court in the June 1 elections.

The Senate Speaker, Gerardo Fernandez Noronia, told X that the legal field of that room “withdrawing the challenge” to the last INE agreement, regarding nominations for the incorporation of the judiciary.

This agreement proves that INE will review that the applicants do not bear the issues of the constitutional article 38, regarding that they are fleeing justice, and they have a final ruling on crimes against life and family violence, among other things.

After this failed attempt to replace the functions of electoral government, Fernández Noroña explained that he will preserve the challenges against some applicants when considering insecurity; However, he said that the last word will be in the hands of the electoral institute.

Last Wednesday, joinery He announced that the Senate has challenged the IG agreement to verify that candidates for the judicial elections do not participate in crimes, which aim to determine the inappropriate to compete in the elections, a task that is compatible with the law with the law.

Senate. Leave the reviews

He withdrew the challenge facing the recent agreement from the electoral ruling on verifying the health of applicants who may participate in crimes.

The Senate’s Board of Directors of the National Electoral Institute’s replacement jobs (INE) gave the health of the controversial candidates for judges, judges and ministers in the Supreme Court of the Nation (SCJN) in the June 1 elections.

The Senate Speaker Gerardo Fernandez Noronia, through his novel “X”, has reported that the legal field of this hall “withdrawing the challenge” of the last agreement of the National Electoral Institute (I) regarding nominations to integrate the judiciary, although it will remain challenges for some candidates to improve.

“The legal field of the Senate has withdrawn the challenge facing the agreement of the agreement on the nominations for the incorporation of the judiciary, and I hope that the challenges of the specified candidates will be presented due to the lack of suitability.”

Last Monday, the Senate was stabbed in the INE agreement approved by the measures followed by the electoral authority to verify that the candidates for fees in the extraordinary electoral process of the Federation’s Judicial Authority 2024-2025 may participate in crimes.

The Senate was aimed at identifying the candidates who were not suitable for the judicial elections, a task that corresponds to the law with INE.

The challenge was presented on Monday, April 28, and referred to the INE agreement, which shows that it will be reviewed that the candidates for the judicial branch of the union do not bear the issues of the constitutional article 38, in its V -Vi, VI and VII numbers, indicating that “a gift from justice from justice, where the issuance order is issued to have about the banking procedure.”

After this failed attempt to replace the jobs INE, the Senate Speaker said that individual challenges will be presented to the electoral authority against the profiles of the candidates that are not appropriate to integrate the judiciary, but the last word will be in the hands of the institute.

Gerardo Fernandez Noronia said that so far it has signed three deals: one of them is targeting the public prosecutor of the Republic, Alejandro Gertz Maniro, with a request to obtain information in some cases.

Another directed to the Minister of Public Security and Citizen Protection, Omar Garcia Harvoush, in a similar sense; And one another for the head of the National Electoral Institute, Guadalobi Tadi Zavala.

The INE Agreement establishes a review so that the candidates for candidates in the exceptional electoral process to elect various sites of the Federation’s Judicial Authority (Peepjf) did not incur 2024-2025, that is, any of the cases that it considers “8 of 8 against violence”, and also does not abandon their political rights.

This state is derived from Article 38, Fractions V, VI and VII, from the political constitution of the United States and in Article 442 BIS, with regard to Article 456, Issue 1, sub -section C), the third section of the public law full of citizens:

To obtain a final punishment for the deliberate committee of crimes against life, body safety, sexual freedom and security, as well as natural psychological development.

Family violence has equal or domestic family violence; Violation of intimate sexual relationship; For political violence against women in the field of sex (VPMRG), in any of its methods and types and to announce a person of food water.

In addition, because he is a fleeing or fleeing justice, where the arrest order is issued to describe the criminal procedure and by execution that imposes this suspension as a punishment.