He Court of Royalty He has ruled that the definition of the word ‘female’ is referred to as a woman belonging to a biological gender, which is understood from birth, according to the 2010 Equality Act. This definition Scottish will reject the government’s argument Trans includes women. According to Justice Patrick Hodge, five court judges unanimously spoken in favor of the decision.
This indicates that a transport person with a certificate of recognition as a woman should not be considered a woman Equality. Of course, the court underlined the court that “the safety of the people of the trans people” is “protected from discrimination due to sex change.”
The case is its appearance a The 2018 Act approved by the Scottish Parliament It establishes that 50% of the management boards of the Scottish public organizations must have female representation. Trans women had to be included in accordance with the quota.
Feminist groups challenged the Scottish government welcomed the verdict on Wednesday. “The court has given us the right answer: Sex – Magulin and Woman – Protected Characteristics – refers to reality, not paperwork,” said Maya Forster of the Sex Matters group. Scotland for womenA group that protects women’s rights was filed by a legal appeal that claims to “believe that there are only two sexes.”
The group said the redefinition of the women raised in Scotland was beyond the contest of the Scottish parliament. But Scottish representatives later released New guidelines It was established that the definition of women includes people with gender accreditation certificates. The appeal was rejected by a court in 2022, but last year’s group was given their case before their case Court.
F.W.S. Biological sex Because “normal and everyday language” is understood.
Scottish Green has criticized the penalty, and Deputy Maggie Chapman described the “deep concern for human rights” on a post on the social network. Amnesty International He said that transgender people from sexual discrimination to safety In contrast to the law of human rights.
The organization presented a letter before the court that revealed it The concern for the worsening of transgender rights In the United Kingdom and Abroad. “The common principle of excluding transcendants from services for a sex is not proportional to achieve a formal goal,” the Human Rights Organization said.
