The unjustified discounts scheme on retired and retired salary statements at the National Social Security Institute (INSS) has become a approvals of changes in the legislation made by Congress.
The main change was made in 2019 of the changes to a temporary scale for the Jayir Bolsonaro government (PL). The purpose of MP871/2019 was to set new rules for identifying violations and avoiding fraud in benefits.
It was reported by Paulo Eduardo Martins (PR) at the time, this procedure was a target for intensive negotiation. Martins is currently the Vice May of Coritya by PL.
The text received 578 amendments to the mixed commission in which it was analyzed. Most of them were presented by the left parties, who opposed the government at the time. The Labor Party was the comment that presented the largest number: 253.
Representatives of the left parties argued at the time that the proposal harmed the beneficiaries of influential rights, especially rural workers.
Control discounts
In the original text of the temporary scale, the Bolsonaro government suggested that reformulating the discounts conducted by entities and associations has been made annually.
However, the text that was approved in Congress extended this period to every three years, from December 31, 2021. Then, in 2022, another temporary procedure (MP 1107/2022) canceled this rule and ended the review expectations.
In 2019, the change in interconnected discounts was proposed at at least 32 modifications in MP871, according to CNN.
Parliamentarians from the following parties made proposals to extend the re -verification period or withdraw the deadline: PT (16), Solidarity (3); B pc (3); PSB (3); MDB (2); PR, the previous name of PL (2); And PSDB (3).
From the suggestions, he suggested 16 to end the annual reinforcement, as proposed in the original text of the Bolsonaro government; 14 suggested that the re -verification be every five years (60 months); And two re -verification every three years (36 months).
However, the expression was not limited to the left parties. For MP Rapporteur, the central parties also supported the change in the deduction period.
“This was an obsession for left -wing deputies, but he had to stick to some of Centrão. Since the government had not had an organized base yet, it had to negotiate to reduce obstacles and the entire deputy lost, because MP has the expiration date,” Paulo Eduardo Martins told CNN.
Since 1991, the monthly opponent has been expected for the advantages of social security by the sector’s entities, provided that the association is legally recognized and there is a mandate for subsidiary companies. Left Parliamentarians who are not historically associated with representative institutions.
In the amendments submitted, Al -Mabrat argued that the entities guaranteed the performance of civil society in defense of their interests, collective and individual, and have a constitutional prediction.
Also, the other excerpts of the text were negotiating with the members of Centrão. So PP leader, Arthur Lira (AL), participated in talks on the changes that struck countryside workers. PDT has suggested a major amendment to the topic, with the support of Lira, PT and PSB leaders.
MP871 was approved with a tight deadline for Congress, close to losing its validity, after obstructing the left parties and a series of negotiations in the House of Representatives.
It received the support of the deputies after hours of the discussion that extended the session even after midnight, as it was approved at the first hour of May 30, 2019. In the Senate, the text was passed on July 3.
In a statement issued on Tuesday (13), the leader of the Parliament’s Labor Party, Lindberg Farias (RJ), said that at the time of the representative’s approval, the abbreviation was spent to prevent the abolition of rights. He denied that the explanatory name “spent to relax the final dates on monthly discounts.”
“The subject of discounts was a guarantee,” Lindberg said.
The main struggle, according to Petista leader, involves rural workers’ rights. “We are acting strongly to prevent the deputy from changing the mechanisms of proof of rural activity to family agriculture. We adopt an obstruction and a very fixed position for the deputy’s criticism in this regard, which could have easily proven by analyzing the treatment of the material and its notes.”