Investment for security is maintained as a Spanish country for a period of time became a preference Take it What Army spent less than 1.24% of GDPAccording to the annual report released on Thursday for the Atlantic Alliance. As explained in an appearance of Pedro Sanchez, the government reaches 2% of the GDP to reach 2% of the GDP in terms of defensive matters, two days later, 2% of GDP, and two days after the same.
This 1.24%number, less than 1.28%forecast, Western allies are contrary to an increase of 19.4% of military expenditure among Western allies22 of them already meet 2%purpose. According to reports by General Secretary Mark Rutte or US President Donald Trump, that the NATO debate is now increasing that goal to 3% or 5%.
How was it forecast Polish guides the classification of allies with 4.07% investment in GDPAlthough NATO’s current purpose is more than twice as much – reflects a firm response to geo -political tensions in the East. Following them, Estonia (3.41%), Latvia (3.39%) and America (3.19%), all over 3%. Lithuania (3.11%) and Greece (2.99%) appear in the most compromised countries. This information confirms that the most closely close to Russia or a strong military tradition has significantly accelerated investment for security: that is, they look closely with the war.
In the intermediate group, many countries reach or access 2%of the door. Are in them Denmark (2.35%), United Kingdom (2.33%), Finland (2.30%), Romania (2.26%), Sweden (2.25%), Norway (2.21%) And Hungary (2.13%). Germany, Turkey, Czech and the Netherlands are slightly more than 2%. This area reflects the growing alignment with NATO’s duties, although some countries have begun in 2014 from relatively low statistics (2%when the goal is set) and has accelerated their efforts over the past decade.
However, countries like countries France (2.03%), Bulgaria (2.04%) and Slovakia (2.00%) 2%do not reach the doorThis shows that although their costs have increased, their evolution is high. Other countries such as Mandinigro (1.86%), Italy (1.71%) or Portugal (1.50%) are still down, and their increase is moderate compared to 2014. It raises questions about his political preference or financial limits to achieve a common purpose.
Finally, at the bottom of the rankings they are next to Spain (1.24%), Belgium (1.29%), Luxembourg (1.30%), Slovenia (1.37%) and Canada (1.45%). These countries show low -level security costs at a percentage of GDP. Spain, in particular, is separate for the last country on the list, and in the coalition its geopolitical weight, these days the Sanchez government has been proven accurately. This information is underline the pressure on these governments to increase their military investment in the short term of NATO and allies, which is something that Sanchez responds, but everyone thinks that Spain has to go a long way.
In conclusion, all countries are already working on their plans by 2025 because the increase in investment for security and security must continue. In that situation, NATO is divided into two constituencies based on investment for security, and referring to those constituencies is the “intimacy of war” in Ukraine: Baltic work to strengthen their traditional military skills So to speak, although hybrid threats are not ignored; But as many leaders have commented, they need to “prepare for war”. However, in the south, Spain and Italy are asking for a vast security definitionIt is not only focusing on Ryrmem, in addition, a concept that is rejected by both Pedro Sanchez and Georgia Meloni. But the goal of all is the same: according to the new era of protection, according to the new time.
(Tattranslate) true
Story Credit
