Vice-repercussions of the rule of ruling and opposition on Friday (9) Supreme Court Resolution (STF), which formed a majority to suspend criminal action against Federal Representative Alexander Ramjim (PL-RJ).
A Majority decision This happened days after the House of Representatives, and the criminal procedure that is investigating a coup attempt in 2022 was completely suspended. With the decision of the Supreme Court, from the five crimes that are being investigated, only two may have been suspended.
The Labor Party leader (PT) in the House of Representatives, Lindbergh Farias (RJ) celebrated the decision and said that the Supreme Court is the “guardian of the constitution.” The deputy is classified by the scale approved by the House of Representatives as unconstitutional.
“The proposal of the approved decision (by the House of Representatives) distinguishes the transcribed legal deviation, to directly violate the previous decision of the first class, which is limited, by a majority, the possibility of preserving the individual parliament only and only for the crimes committed after its diploma,” he wrote Lindberg. “
The leader also said that the opposition could not “continue to incite insurrection on judicial decisions, remove the initiation of the judiciary and encourage institutional breakage.”
On the other hand, the opposition criticized the decision of the Supreme Court. The PL leader in the House of Representatives, Deputy Sostenes Cavalcante (RJ), said the seat was “deep concern” over the management adopted by the Supreme Court.
The deputy justified that the decision of the House of Representatives was approved by 315 parliamentarian. He said, “Our anxiety is not limited to the fact that Alexander Ramjim, a member of our packages, is mainly, on the fact that he is a legal federal deputy, has been elected by the population.”
Chamber’s decision
On Wednesday (7), the House of Representatives approved, 315 votes to 143, a draft resolution that suspends all the criminal procedures that were investigated in an attempt to coup. Alexander Ramhajim was condemned by the Public Prosecutor’s Office (PGR) for five crimes, and the procedure suspended the council to apply for all crimes.
A request for a criminal procedure was submitted by PL and is based on Article 53 of the Constitution. The standard determines that all deputies and members of the Senate do not speed it, civilians and criminals, “for any of their opinions, words and voices.”
An excerpt from the article indicates that when there is a complaint against Parliament due to a crime that occurred after the diploma, the Supreme Court will be aware of the Congress, and in the political party’s initiative, it is permissible to join the progress made in the case.
STF work
Friday, the first degree of the highest vote to maintain Criminal procedures against the deputy For three crimes: canceling the violence of the rule of democratic law; State coup; And the criminal organization.
Thus, Ramagim was released from responding to two crimes that could have happened after his diploma as a federal deputy: qualified damage and the deterioration of the included heritage. However, voting in the Supreme Court, in part, faces the decision of parliamentarians.
In addition to suspending the procedure against a branch, the decision of the House of Representatives benefited from the other defendants in this process, including former President Gear Bolsonaro (PL). In the Supreme Court, the headquarters of the case, Minister Alexander de Mora, set that the comment cannot apply to the defendants who do not have a parliamentary mandate.
“The requirements of the very personal personality (immunity that applies only to Parliament) and the time (crimes committed after the diploma), stipulated in the constitutional text are clear and expressive, in the sense of the impossibility of imposing this ministry on non -spleen corridors and surgical crimes before the diploma.”