Even death for more than 300 years, the Indian ruler still causes waves in the country’s policy. Aurangzeb Alamgir has become essential at the extent of the extent that his memory caused sectarian violence (conflicts between different groups of the nation) throughout the country.
Many critics consider that the sixth emperor of the famous Mongol dynasty is a tyrant of women who brutally made Hindu temples, forced religious transfers and wars against Hindus and Sikhs.
In a nation now almost entirely under the field of Hindu nationalists, the right -wing politicians used in Uranzip, and converted it to the highest Muslim villain who must be erased.
Sectarian conflicts erupted in the western city of Nagbur last month, when the Hindu nationalists asked to demolish the previous grave of the war.
It is clear that a motivation through the recent decline of the Bollywood movie about the violent Uranquners’ achievements against the Hindu king, has led to dozens of injuries and arrests, prompting Nagbur authorities to impose a collection touch.
As tensions continue between the two societies, many correct Hindus uses the name Aurangzeb to highlight the historical injustice against the majority of the country’s faith.
The rule of the Mongols during the era of invasion, domination and violent power struggles, but also the explosion of art and culture, as well as periods of deep religious success – at least to Aurangzeb.
It was founded by the empire in 1526, covered the empire at its peak a region that spanned from the current Afghanistan in Central Asia to Bangladesh in the east, its arrival at the end of 1857 when the British overthrew the last emperor, Bahmadur Shah II.
His best well -known leaders – Humayun, the largest Jahanji and Shah Jahan – are famous for encouraging religious harmony and strongly influenced many Indian culture, and building creative places such as Taj Mahal and the Red Castle in Delhi.
But among the most tolerant company, Aurangzeb is a kind of black sheep – a religious and complex fanatic character.
Uranzip “said” a mixture of admiration and alienation from the moment of his disagreement to the throne of the Mongols. “
“He attracted a degree of disgust in the way he brought to the throne, imprisoned his father and killed his brothers … At the same time, he gained admiration and loyalty to his personal simplicity and piety, and his unparalleled military power that led to the expansion of the Mongol kingdom, his political guide, administrative effectiveness and his narration in justice and advisory.”
He was born in 1618, the son of Shah Jahan (the famous Taj Mahal) and his wife, Momsaz Mahal (who is his structure), describes the young prince as a sincere and majestic figure, which showed signs of early leadership.
He held several positions since he was 18 years old, all of whom established himself as a capable leader.
The glory of the Mongol Empire reached its climax under his father, and Uranzib fought to control what was the richest throne in the world.
Then, when Shah Jahan fell ill in 1657, the theater was installed into a war of the bitter caliphate between Uranzib and his three brothers, where he will eventually face his older brother Dara Chicouh, a defender of the culture of Hindu success and the series.
Uranzip imprisoned his sick father in 1658 and defeated his brother the following year, before forcing him to show chains in a dirty elephant in the streets of Delhi.
“The favorite son and spoiler of the great Mongols wearing a journey with a rugged piece of fabric,” wrote Jadunath Sarkar in “A Short Story about Uranzib”.
“With a dark and dark turban, only the poorest in their head. There is no necklace or jewelry decorating its person.”
At this time, the Aurangzeb authority reached unusual horizons, and under its leadership, the Mongol Empire reached its greatest geographical extension.
During the first half of his rule, a degree of respect was led, despite the relative tolerance of the majority of Hindu faith.
Even about 1679, there were no reports on the destruction of temples, nor any imposition of “JIZya” or a tax on non -Muslim topics, according to Rezavi, Professor of History at Aligarh University in India. “Just like his predecessors,” Razafi said, “Razafi said, explaining how some Hindus occupied high positions in his government.
However, in 1680, everything changed when you adopt a form of religious fanaticism that repercussions to this day.
The fanatic ruler reduced the classification of the Hindu statesmen, turned friends into enemies, and started a long, unpopular war in Decian, which included the violent repression of Maratas, a Hindu kingdom that has been postponed to this day by right-wing politicians who-comment on Narindra Modi.
BHARATIEA JANATA (BJP) members in Modi rushed to refer to the wires sustained by Aurangzeb – which led to the restoration of JIKya and the killing of non -Muslims.
He also fought against the Sikhs, where he performed the ninth teacher of religion, Tiga Baddour, an act that makes Urangazep a napor between many Sikhs to this day.
This brutality was filmed in the recently released movie “Christa”, which includes Aurangzeb as Islam Burberry, killing Sambhaji, son of King Maratha, Christrapati Shivaji.
“Checks canceled the anger of people in Uranquit,” said Devindra Fadenfis, Prime Minister of Maharashtra, where Nagmor is located.
Muslims claimed that the members of the right -wing group, Fisha Hindu Parish, burned a paper containing verses from the Holy Qur’an.
Yajendra Thakur, a member of the VHP group, denied allegations, but reaffirmed her desire to remove the Aurangzeb grave.
He said, “The tomb of Uranzib should not be here,” he said. CNN From Nagabur. “It should not be here in everything that he did to Shamphaji, a Mehraj. Even our Muslim brothers should issue a statement saying that the grave of Uranquit should not be in Nagbur.”
The Prime Minister, who is publicly carrying his religion, has always been a member of the Rashtia Swamesvac Sang, a right -wing paramilitary organization that defends the Hindu Hemores Corporation in India.
The Hindus in the country is said to have been subjected to historically persecutions first by Mogols, then the British colonists who followed them.
The Maharashtra area was renamed where he was buried, previously known as Orangeabad, in honor of Ibn Shivaji in 2023.
Razafi said that the victories of his ancestors, the great king, Akbar and Shah Jahan, were erased from history books, or they are not taught in schools.
Razafi said: “They are trying to oppose the story and replace it with myths, something of their imagination.” “Aurangzeb is used to give the diabetic to society.”
Modi BJP denies the use of the name Emperor Mugul to distort Indian Muslims. But their detention of ancient rulers in India causes fear and anxiety between the religious minority today.
Although historians agree that he was a dark and complex personality, and they do not oppose his atrocities, Rezavi said that it is necessary to realize that it exists at a time when “India as a concept” was present.
“We are talking about a time when there was no constitution, there was no parliament, and there was no democracy,” Razafi said.
Kaker seems to agree. He said that such historical figures “do not deserve evidence or guilt.” “They must be understood in the context of their time, and it is very far from our context.”
In Nagbur, the demands of removing the grave remained unanswered, with some Hindu members on the far right until the demolition requests were disposed of.
Local Muslim resident, Asif QRSHI, stated that his hometown did not see violence like the violence that was revealed last month, which condemned the confrontations wandering in the historic peaceful city.
