Victory Vibes | Inspiring Stories of Triumph and Resilience

The draft of the Constitutional Court of Appeal supports Irene Montero’s ‘Trans Act’ with some changes

He Constitutional court (DC) will examine the resource of PP this week Lay Trans From a presentation Supports the main features of the rule “They are very controversial,” even though they make changes.

Will make the complete magistrate analysis that begins on Tuesday PP’s proof against many articles The law is for the real and useful equality of trans people and the rights of the rights of the people recognized by the recognized LGDPI in 2023.

The presentation, written by the progressive magistrate Juan Carlos ComboProposes to somewhat evaluate the ‘popular’ challenge, but the circles consulted by the Europa Press underline this as a lower “question” Attorneys who guarantee the basis of the law.

Instead of, yes Two order violations are beyond the constitution: One is about the spread of books and teaching materials that present a report on the inferiorization of LGDPI+ groups and the violations against the law is another trigger.

However, the different feelings in the court are advised by EFE, as the field presentation is “a plan” and “there is a lot of discussions about this resource”. “A complex and controversial issue”.

So much, that They see it as “hard to close”Among other things, the definitions of gender and gender and all the controversies on the rights of Trans and Intersex people.

“Many things are mixed with this resource”.

That “tension” mainly affects the progressive majority of the court, so Resource resolution is unpredictable Also, the upcoming dates require more complete sessions.

L Pb and Missed Current Trans Regulations recognize the person’s wishes as the only requirement to change the sex of the registry from the age of 16, and the Vox Appeals in front of the Constitutional Court.

Alarm the celebrity The consequences of harmfulness, In particular, in children, they condemn the terms “new yes yes” and point out that there are countries that support these types of rules that recognize gender self -determination.

Bb -appealed articles

In particular, PP is looking for Article 19.2This allows Genital change in children aged 12 to 16 When the minor asks it, “At any time, because of his age and maturity, he can agree in an informed way.”

Alberto Nees Fijowin also challenged The first two categories of section 43This allows children between the ages of 15 and 16 to request sexual change in a civil registry attended by their legal representatives, and people over the age of 16 may ask them.

As well as, they have hit 3 and 9 sections of section 44This procedure is exempted from providing medical or psychological report and “the previous change in the appearance or physical activity of the person through medical, surgery or other procedures.”

The Article 47Accordingly, “Six months after registering the civil registry to repair the sexual registration note, the revision of the previously appeared gender record may be restored.

PP Studes are also driven against Section 3 of Section 79. P)It refers to the administrative violation of the “legal businesses, imposing actions or rules or subdivisions, directly or indirectly, ‘Trans'” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” “” ” “

And against Sections 4 c) yf) In the same commands, the expansion, use or propagation in the educational centers of teaching materials, which define as serious administrative violations, are high or less in the human race depending on their sexual orientation and identity, sex expression or sexual characteristics “; And “calling for public events or recreational activities, the inspiration for its material to perform serious or more serious behaviors.”

.

Story Credit

Exit mobile version