Three judges of the Conservative Division Constitutional court (TC) has requested a complete person of the court headed by Gondit Provide an initial judgment in front of the EU’s Judge (TJUE) Court Civil apology .
Progressing World The petition was filed by Judges Caesar Dolosa, Contextian Espegell and Enrik Arnoldo on Monday. Sources indicate that the three signat not first, the Constitution itself raises an initial judgment before the TJUE. However, completely denies their requestDJU for issues of public apology BB was raised by other courts to impose their punishment on the appeal.
Dolosa, Arnoldo and Espegel accepted that decision to consider Amnesty’s law Exceeds the rights of the EU Therefore, the maximum translator of the claimed right must be pronounced: Tjue. If all three signs are raised, it has been decided to wait to pronounce TJue in the advice of other courts in the case of PP’s resource. The stroke of the debate and the judgment of the stated appeal, In practice it translates all things that affect the stated rule.
The demand of these three magistrates is being held ahead of a new complete session, in which no issues relating to a general amnesty are planned. However, consult sources remember that in court They are already working on products for the first sentence.
About thirty pending problems
It should be remembered that the leader of the Constitution told an informed breakfast in April He planned a court to defeat the amnesty before summer. In that case, he recalled that there were thirty unresolved problems associated with the quality of the CD.
According to the sources, the verdict on the ‘popular’ appeal is planned to mark the way for the responses for other non -constitutional resources issued against Amnesti -15. The first thing to be discussed is the resource of the BP, This is because it challenges the entire law and can extend to other challenges that its judgment has been given.
Total, There are five issues of non -constitution before the Constitution: The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court (DSCJ) and three from Madrid’s provincial court.
In addition, DC is pending for the Amberbar resources provided by the condemned independent leaders Process It went to the guaranteed court after the Supreme Court rejected the use of the amnesty law for the fraudulent crime that was convicted in 2019.