Years have passed, governments are successful, the projects and reforms are multiplied, the new legal statistics are created, the training has been changed, the “shallow board” of everything from the previous political cycle …
Author Francisco Gomez Da Silva *
You read an article without payment access. Donate the newspaper to help you keep online News Teveroa free.
Let me explain what I mean better. Politically, forest burns, which occur for many reasons. Burning, because a forest that is almost exclusively exclusively exclusively by man, away from the image of the people of these forests. Burning, because, every year, to a higher or lesser extent, it burns. Burning, because it is not limited to the production of biodiversity such as a forest and carbon smuggling or fairy tales that produce raw materials for important forest -based industries.
It burns because the forest is to significantly increase its productivity and that it is only possible through the clear intensity of the management positions it is targeted – it burns the “standard forest management” principles as defined by forest Europe – a permanent intermediate conference for the safety of forests in Europe.
No, the significant intensity of the forest management positions one desired does not mean “abandoning” a set of environmental values. On the contrary, we are actively intensifying the administration of the cultivated forests in our country, often set up by pine-brave settlements, eucalyptus settlements and sick settlements, and their contribution to these natural values we used to appoint “environmental system services”.
But after all, there is a reason to burn the forest: in the last 10 to 15 years, this is the “bad name” built for this forest we have in Portugal. Is this a bad name based on the knowledge made by science? No, none of these, like I explain below.
Interior-mirror_francisco_silva
This bad name is initially focused on eucalyptus, gradually extended to Bravo Pin, and now, no tribal forest species (yet) are not public, which demonstrates the recent study of the Forest feelings of the ISCD for Navigator Company. Large, in my opinion, this bad name is responsible for the generalization of journalists, and they include forest -related topics to the extent of their skills and responsibilities.
Now, politically, these “concept producers” (with a timely grace, named “tudologists”) are more actively echoing than the other concept and general opinion published. The fear of the election impact of the election impact of the acting of the concept for the producers is the rest: results and actions are avoided, and another study, project or strategy is promoted. However, time passes and another political cycle will begin, so others will study, plan, and do not work again.
Sorry, but in my opinion (I give it here, because they heard it!) No more studies, diagnosis and plans. There is only one thing to do: Leave it to the territory and intensify the managing the wilderness. Manage, manage, manage!
It is urgent to have the courage and courage to define the 10, 20 and 30 years of the parties that want to play a role in the administration of our country, as it does not sympathize with the time of forest for politicians. And it is not shy that they will put productivity goals in their minds.
In order not to complicate, it is sufficient to take the target of copying the productivity of the pine tree, eucalyptus vood and cork on this horizon. I assure you that we will reduce the ability to have our wilderness.
* Doctoral Degree in Agriculture (ISA), Postgraduate in Business Science (ISCDE), Degree in Agricultural Engineering (ISA). The article was originally published in Florestas.
Channel News Teverao on WhatsApp.
Advertising and services
• You can quickly implement advertising campaigns in notíciasdeaveiro.t in the newspaper, as well as other services. Access information to include online ad.
(tagstotranslate) economy
Story Credit