Teacher and jurisprudence W aálter maryovitch He made harsh criticism of the recent decisions of the Supreme Court (STF) Regarding January 8 cases. During an interview with the newspaper Ww This Monday (24), stated that the Supreme Court “committed errors and declining the period of the eighteenth century, when the penalties and criminal law are human.”
Mayirovic has argued that the court ignores the basic principles of modern criminal law, especially with regard to the allocation of penalties.
“It is not possible that there is a typical adequacy and after this typical sufficiency, the ministers forget or forget that individuality represents something else,” he said.
Jurisprudence realized the severity of the events that occurred on January 8, 2023, and the classification of those involved as “fraudulent” “exceeded” a lot. However, he stressed that “the punishment is not public revenge” and that the concept of criminal policy in modern law.
Wálter Maerovitch explained that in the context of the Penal Code, criminal policy aims to avoid exaggerated penalties. He said, “There is something in the modern criminal law called criminal policy. I am not talking about the party’s policy. I am talking about criminal policy within the Penal Code, which means not to leave exaggerated penalties.”
In cases of multiple crimes, the teacher is a tendency to join penalties to avoid unfair punishment. He explained: “The conjugation is often performed, the intersection of crimes imagines, and imagine that someone has been convicted of invading the house and stealing the delegate, so there is always a intersection. Because the penalties that do not become unfair.”
He concluded that “the Federal Supreme Court turned his back on this (to avoid unfair penalties) and admitted exaggerated, and exceeded the fixation of the sanctions, and concluded all the limits of reasonable.”
