On Friday (9), the first degree of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) ruled that part of the criminal lawsuit against Federal MP Alexander Ramhajim (PL-RJ) for his involvement in an alleged attempt.
Unanimously, the ministers understood that the crimes committed after the branch as a deputy may be suspended.
Ramaj is accused of five crimes, but only two would have occurred after their diploma: qualified damage with violence or a serious threat against the heritage of the Union, causing severe damage and the deterioration of the listed assets.
With the decision, a branch now only responds to the crimes of the armed criminal organization; He tried to cancel the rule of law and democratic coup.
The suspension of crimes was after the House of Representatives request. By 315 votes to 143, Parliamentarians approved on Wednesday (7) the draft resolution submitted by Representative Alfredo Gasbar (Al -Ittihad), scheduled for the Constitution and Justice Committee (CCJ), which fully suspends the criminal procedure against a branch. Only part of it, was accepted by the ministers.
The proposal also opened a violation of the interpretation to cover the entire investigation, including other defendants in the case, which was prevented by the higher.
The application was submitted by PL based on Article 53 of the Constitution, which proves that if there is a complaint of the crime committed after the diploma, the Supreme Court must transfer Congress, which, as an initiative from the political party, must be decided to support the process.
In March, the Supreme Court accepted the complaint against the branching in the context of an investigation into the alleged “Johar Hasm” for the coup plot, which also includes former President Gere Bolsonaro, former and military ministers.
See how every minister voted
Experience analysis occurs in the virtual plenary session and began this Friday (9). First for the vote, the relationship of the case, Minister Alexander de Mora, stressed that the understanding of the legislative body is a “very personal person”, meaning that it does not apply to others who have been investigated in this process.
“The requirements of the very personal personality (immunity that applies only to Parliament) and the time (crimes committed after the diploma), stipulated in the constitutional text are clear and expressive, in the sense of the impossibility of imposing this ministry on non -spleen corridors and surgical crimes before the diploma.”
Minister Cristiano Zanin was accompanied by Morais’s vote. He stressed that it would be possible to only get rid of the crimes committed after their graduation as a deputy. Moreover, he argued: “immunity does not apply to non -paratroopers or violations before the diploma.”
Minister Flevio Dino Mawis was accompanied, but with warnings. Among them, he adopted cutting the operation, ensuring that criminal measures are taken on alleged crimes before the diploma.
In this sense, the minister also questioned the implementation of the constitution base, which covers the suspension of procedures against deputies since the diploma. For the minister, this device should only be applied to those who already practice the mandate.
In addition, another warning from Dino was that the suspension could only be valid for this legislative body, and if the branch was arrested or removed, the criminal procedures will be valid again.
Minister Louise Fox joined Zanin and was also accompanied by Maurice’s vote. He cited the cases of the federal constitution and stated that the comment approved by the House of Representatives could only reach the crimes committed after the branch diploma as a deputy.
Carmen Lesia, the last minister of voting, was accompanied by the decision minister and stated in a vote that XXX.
