Victory Vibes | Inspiring Stories of Triumph and Resilience

Should synchronous funds be used to finance European security?

Advertisement

Before American withdrawal And the war of Ukraine, the Union Find financial assistance for security. Therefore, the European Commission proposes to replace a portion of the synchronization fund towards this new priority. Created in 1994, these funds are especially helping to fund Environmental plans And Trans -European networks in member states Lower rent Individual National Brutta.

In the European Parliament, the Greens are totally against this wishes: “We have financial economic challenges and social sectors in synchronization projects,” he told the German European Euro -Euro -Euro -Euro -Euro -Euro -Euro -Euro -euroinz of the Green Group/European Free Alliance. “You have to invest in ProtectionYes, but you have to do it with new money, and when the commission proposes, a portion of the synchronization fund should not be recycled, ”says Andresan.

Sync funds mark 392,000 million eurosThat is, one third of the European budget for 2021-2027, but only 7% has actually spent and 30% is planned. The reason is that the authorities have first used other projects like the project NextgenerationIts purpose is to help economies Recover from the infection Govid -1

Bulgarian eurobed Andrey novakov During a debate in the European Parliament in early April, the European Popular Party (PPE) did not hesitate to qualify for the syncal policy of “Slipping Beauty”.

Civil and military use

Currently, these funds Cannot use them to finance forces Or buy military object. However, they can be used to pay for products with civil and military applications such as drones or machinery.

“As a general rule, funds of synchronization policy should not be used to strengthen security because it is the largest fund that is equal to the growth opportunities of European regions. However, there are exceptions because we are talking about Double investmentsUse This can be funded by synchronous policy, ”says the European famous party (PPE), Polish Eurottipat Jasek Protas.

Therefore, in his opinion, sync policy should be financed for the reinforcement of bridges and access roads Russia, Ukraine and Belarus borders“,”Make the shelves Under public buildings under “or” Hospitals Possible armed conflict “and also states:“ They are investments that serve the local people day by day, and in times Kerera They can also work Protection“.

CE synchronization policy

Although some national and local authorities fear that sync funds are centered, but the answer Authority It wants to give a large amount of maneuvers to countries that want to finance their safety.

“Many Poor Places Even in the EU Russian threat It is great. Therefore, this is not harmful to the struggle against European inequality, ”he told the Carwan Walsh, a co -researcher of the European popular party (PPE), Wilprit Martens Center for European Studies Center.

“If it is invested in the modernization of industry in Bulgaria and Romania, it is constantly investing in EU synchronization,” says Walshey. However, there are still obstacles. For example, the 37% of funds Sync should be used for related projects Weather.

Before you point out that “if you areolate the military string, it is not completely exclusive to your climate goals (…),” Carwan Walshey says, “No one here is talking about electrical tanks.” In addition to security, the European Commission proposes that these funds should be allocated DeferbonizationThe LivingHe AcuaAnd energy.

.

Story Credit

Exit mobile version