A Part Two From the first day of the ruling in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) to analyze the complaint against the former president Gear Bolsonaro And 7 other people by trying to the coup was Denial defensesQuestions from lawyers and the decision to maintain the claim of the previous MARO CID order and the case in the first place.
After having paralyzed at about 12 pm, the experiment returned at 2 pm and ended after 5 pm.
The decision about acceptance or not complaining about the Supreme Court Stay in the next sessionWhich happens on Wednesday (26), from 9:30 am.
See everything that happened in the second part of the trial:
FUX varies, but if it remains in the first row
In the afternoon, the ministers have determined that the trial will remain in the first place.
However, there was a difference: Minister Louise Fox did not follow the Alexander de Morais vote He welcomed the first that requested the analysis of the ruling in the plenary session, with the participation of the 11 judges.
Voting, Fox stated that the matter “The issue is not this toxicity”And that was “changed and recovered”.
The judge said: “Or we judge people who have a privilege and the right place will be the plenary session. The fact that there are many measures that stem from the number of parties concerned is a multiplicity.”
Moais has already defended the vote that “the treatment is equal to all the accused, all of whom are accused, there is no different treatment.” First -class ministers, Florio Dino, Cristiano Zanin and Cármen Lúcia, are followed.
CID DELAAT
The defense of former President Geer Bolsonaro also asked to condemn the previous decree of orders, and the Valentine Colonel Mauro Sayed, and asked to cancel.
A The first class decided to preserve it, Unanimously, the military certificate. Moees stated that there were no violations in the statements that the condemnation was voluntary and that at any time there was no pressure or interference in the court.
After the first day of the session, the lawyer of the lawyer, Celso Veiladi, the press said Think that the court “invented jurisprudence” by not canceling the dedication of the colonel, but the supreme decisions must be respected and fulfilled.
Mauro Sayed’s defense, during his preliminary defense in the morning, argued that the customer “He only served justice.”
“CID is the collaborator, he only worked in justice. He has made his contribution, and part of his contribution, to direct and inform, simply,” said lawyer Cesar Bitlink.
MAURO CID was the assistant to the previous president’s orders and was nominated as one of the “decisive nucleus” members of the alleged criminal organization he acted for a coup attempt.
Access to tests
It was also rejected unanimously The claim that the defenses of those involved in the alleged coup plan cannot reach evidence.
During oral support, the defendant’s lawyers have argued that they could not reach the total archives from what was extracted from the seized mobile phones, for example, so that they can build their own novel, while highlighting the facts that they believe are important to their innocent customers.
“Where is the full agenda? They were pages of the agenda, but there is no matter. Pages are in good condition? I have no way to say,” Matheus Milanez, who represents the general reserve year, represents the former Prime Minister of GSI for the presidency of the Republic.
The same position was preserved by the Attorney General Walter Braga Nito, jurisprudence Jose Oliveira Lima, who assessed that “the defense is not in the same position as the accusation.”
Attorney Demosthenes Torres, which represents the Admiral Mir GarnierHe also accused PGR and PF except for the facts that could deny the accusation.
As he put it, PF is not taking into account contradictions such as the fact that his client is not in Brazilia accused by investigators of participating in the actions of the deception.
Morais rejects “hunting proof”
The minister and the award for the case Alexander de Morris also rejected the pretext of defending former President Geer Bolsonaro Ali The possibility of “hunting proof”.
The meaning of the term consists of achieving without a specific goal, which searches for any evidence of trying to criminalize a person.
“The detailed investigation cannot be confused with constant hunting. In fact, there was a move to the investigation,” Stf said by rejecting the Polsonaro defense argument.
The former president has raised the hypotheses in the live broadcast and the live broadcast that has participated in recent weeks, referring to the term in English, “Fishing Trip”.
Judge guarantee
Bolsonaro’s argument was also rejected unanimously, to ensure a fair trial of the former president, A type of “warranty judge” must be placed for the case.
The warranty judge is a number created in 2019, during the private Bolsonaro government, which states that the judge responsible for the case in the investigation phase is not the same person responsible for the sentence.
The idea is that this separation will enhance more neutrality of the ruling – because, without the number of the guarantee judge, the same judge who may have ordered preventive detention during the investigations will be responsible for condemnation or the absence of the same individuals.
The defense said: “The ruling of guarantees, although it is new, is one of these tools, in this case, will make the separation between the investigation activity effective and the activity of the ruling.”