First Vice President, Maria Jesus MonteroHe wants to make his position more clarify about what is freed Dani Alves Because, in his opinion, Highlights “The reliability of the victim”However, he reiterates his pardon “The ways it is revealed” About the assumption of innocence. “I have withdrawn words because if they distract the background debate, I have no problem,” he said at the breakfast he organized Analusia’s mail. Montero has assured that this debate about PP’s assumption is “interested” and that “nothing is important” and a substantial issue. In his opinion, Has tried to do “political benefit” in this regard.
The leader of the Andalusia’s BSO said, “This debate is worth it,” said the leader of the “When there were no witnesses” pointed out that these kinds of illegal are occurring, so the story of the victim is “very important”. “The judicial parameters are to progress It is not applicable to assuming innocence with testimony“He reiterated it, and like his colleagues in the council, like his colleagues in the council, after this verdict of DSJC, someone thinks someone would think” because they won’t believe it because they won’t believe it. “
He also requested his right to “disagree with a sentence”, although he regretted that the same “temperature” issues are deepening the important thing, and it says that it happened with the law. “Has the approval or reduction of penalties discussed?” Has he questioned to strengthen his approach to “try to avoid background debate” in these matters? “There are many methods to provide consistency to these testimony I think the court condemned the Alvas did it and did all the harshness to provide the quality of evidence, ”he said of the first sentence of the Barcelona trial.
Regarding why it took so long to apologize, the Finance Minister said that it was not “before” and that she is important to her “depth of this debate.” “I apologize for the way I revealed it Of course it is not very perfect I think the debate is actually withdrawn from what is really important to ensure that the assumption of innocence is not “aimed at questioning a basic constitutional right”.
Accurately, mounted against Montero BB’s assumption of innocence “never respect” When “every day” she and her government get “allegations”, “they steal, win, deceive” and “no one appeals to the assumption of” innocent when it is a constitutional right “.”It shows that the PP debate is interested in this issue. “He started, and therefore, he accused someone of trying to” say something “and try to” have political good “.
