In general they avoid doing their own actions or reproduced words Maria Jesus Montero In the release of Dani AlvesMonklova tries to protect it with the first vice president At any time he did not question the assumption of innocence. Montero said in a rally on Sunday, “It is shameful to be in the presence of innocence than young women who condemn the powerful,” which caused criticism between judicial associations, parties and CGPJ’s pronunciation. Monklova has chosen to support Montero and believes that you can comment on them even if the government respects judicial punishment.
Government sources deny that the vice president is unfortunate in his statements. They assume that he has no respect for any sentence, He simply expresses his opinion They say that Montero does not respect the judicial resolutions. “It is logical and clearly visible to respect the government for justice and different sentences It is not hostile to comment on them“This Tuesday after the Ministers’ House, this Tuesday spoke to the spokesman Bilar Alex.
However, they acknowledged what the first vice president had revealed, however, Home Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska, Montero, said that “he has clarified his demonstrations” and that we should “prolong the debate”. In particular, Andalusia’s PSOE leader issued a message on social networks The rejection can be revealed ”that the assumption of innocence” should not be prevented “ To formally question the occupations and women affected by the machine. “
His administrative companions also used to support the argument. Joy has promised Montero You have the right to comment on a sentence that created “confusion” He said this is more essential than continuing to condemn women and victims. “We can change the importance of complaints to change things and end this type of behavior,” a government spokesman said. “It is important that the victims know that they are not alone. Not yesterday or today or tomorrow,” he said below.
Marleska is not so deep in Montero’s reports. Sexual violence has focused on ensuring that sexual violence is “a social suffering”, so “all officials” and the powers of the state -the legislature and the judiciary – They should explain their expressions and resolutions “well”.
Otherwise, according to Marleska, “some decisions” are reached, and this issue requires “the maximum awareness of society” so that the violent women do not feel “insecure” or not lose “confidence” in companies. “These resolutions must be explained very well, especially if the victims will not lose confidence in companies,” he reiterated.