Jose Boindia Higwish- a crisis in the Eye of the United Nations disappeared

The crisis is known to have disappeared in Mexico in the world due to great landmarks such as San Fernando or Ayotzinaba, but it gets a degree of super vision when you enter the United Nations agenda. This is the goal of opening an extraordinary condemnation against the enforced disappearance in the country, which the government refuses to accept as a general and methodological practice.

At the turn, the accusation of the enforced disappearance committee as a “cold water bucket” on the expectation of the disappearance of the state of the disappearance. The government, in this claim, makes the same mistake as previous errors; In the same way that they refuse, like them, complaints from the international community about the serious violations of unbearable human rights; Which lasts follows in the claim of the victims. But the attempt to circumvent or turn attention to overcoming political costs from the tragedy of disappearance was only able to lose or unknown to the basic problem: in the country, there are more than 127,000, 72,000 unidentified bodies and 6000 secret edge. Evidence for this, deepening the crisis and the absence of responses visiting the deprivation of the problem of structural security for two decades, in addition, the victims can never disappear.

However, the complaint this time has after the first time in the history of Article 34 of the United Nations Convention, which provides for a mechanism to transfer to the General Assembly if it is achieved from indicators of foundations for enforced disappearance “generalized and systematic”, as the committee assumes; This justifies the urgent need to force the state to take action against fully punishment for crimes against humanity that multiplies with Narco violence.

The claim to draw the international attention to this problem in Mexico is not new, but it is amazing to open an extremist mechanism that creates a conviction against the state. From Ayotzinaba, in 2015, the committee considered that the disappearance is a “generalized” problem for its occurrence in most countries; Now a “methodology” for the warning action guidelines that may involve the authorities.

The government’s dissatisfaction is not subject to a sharp negativity to the accusation that disappearance is the state’s policy. Claudia Shinbom He accuses the ignorance of the committee and in the Senate wants to ask the United Nations to refuse its responsible person, Olivier de FranvilleWith exploration expressions similar to that in the past. Although it is irony that the new shock occurs when the president begins, by Teuchitlán, to show signs of addressing the problem as a “national priority” and an appreciation of victims in the first line of politics; And “disappearance” stood unlike their predecessor. But the heart of the conflict is not that the government denies a disappearance, on the contrary, recognizes the opening of the dialogue with the victims, the need to reform the law and a record that is not reached. What he rejects is that they refer to “compulsion” because it will include the authorities, and thus attribute them to an issue between individuals and Narco violence. The marrow in its protest is that the complaint is part of looking at the fact that criminal violence and impunity, methodology and extended, depends on collusion through work or omission in various forces and government levels, but not only in it.

What will happen? First, it would be a mistake to stop the approach and dialogue with the victims to avoid their criticism of the government against the United Nations, because they are the source of the committee’s complaint, in addition to unrestricted request data and official reports; Or to fear that the mothers will become political representatives. Secondly, an investigation into the United Nations Committee requires government cooperation with the information that can be denied by the crisis, although he says that he does not judge in advance the responsibility of the Mexican state in the disappearance resources and that his complaint also indicates organized crime and not only for representatives in the state.

But it is difficult to remain silent after launching a more extremist mechanism against enforced disappearance to allow you to maintain the issue on the United Nations agenda and focus international attention to forcing the government’s performance on impunity.