According to a study conducted by the electoral judicial observatory of all polling cards, 439 nominations from 3 thousand 202 that appear, and the result is practically decided due to “errors” in ticket design.
From this amount, 133 has a 100 % opportunity to win, and 201 nomination has no possibility to compete, while 121 have 6 % possibilities, so they conclude that “the design of ballot cards is determined for inequality in the elections.”
In addition, it is reported that the enlightened vote will be almost impossible, by calculating that all profiles for each of the dozens of candidates who will have to review it, can carry between 15 and 18 hours, which makes the enlightened vote difficult, as the average candidate in average for each reading from each region before reading the time, without reading the improved time, until it reads the improved time to read the local until reading until reading until reading even reading Reading even reading until reading until reading until the reading is done until the time when it is read the time when it is read. Nominations.
You have to remember that joinery He carried out the practice of reading 64 files for the ministers, its proposals, the full curricula and the vision of the judiciary, which lasted 10 hours with 41 minutes, the work was published on May 12.
The results of the possible practice of the electoral judicial observatory will be presented on Thursday in its latest report called the early results in the judicial elections: inequality in the electoral competition.
Filters provided
In this report, he confirms that “this contrast in the conditions of efficiency emerges through the application of the rules of parity between the gender, geographical distribution and the appointment of legal specializations, and the elements that together generate high or void scenarios of competition.
The three organizations conforming to the observatory have developed a possibility of a possibility based on the Baysi models, “where we collect data and have performed various simulations on the conditions of each of the 3,202 candidates in exchange for the provincial courts and the district judges.”
Variables such as the distribution of candidates according to the charge (the number of positions and the number of candidates for specialization, sex and the electoral district in the province) included, “and we combine possible scenarios, we analyze the possibilities of fairness in the electoral competition.
We also look at the number of boxes on voting cards for each sex and the standards published for gender equal. “
The above showed that, for example, 201 people likely to win because, because, at least one person and at least two of the opposite sex, they compete for a vacancy (175 cases) and because men who have some of the possibility of winning, may not occupy the position of the criteria for the article (26 cases).
In addition, “121 people”, less than 6 %, may win, because there are many candidates, 3 or more, one sex, and a few candidates from the opposite sex from 2 to 3, compete for a vacancy (107 cases), in addition, women where other women are against one man, but with the minimum possibility of statues by sexes).
Finally, 133 people have a 100 % chance of winning because: a candidate for sex and at least other sexual candidates compete for a vacant (68 cases), the same amount of vacancies and the same number of vacancies (9 cases), the same number of vacancies for sex and people of the same sex (46 cases) and women who increase to 100 % of the possibility of adapting to guarantee sex (10 cases)
The electoral observatory explains that these expectations are a possibility and take into account that all voters fill all their ticket funds without calculating empty votes.
- 121 6 % applicants have a chance to win, according to the accommodation on tickets.
- 133 Candidates are guaranteed from victory due to election engineering.
(Tagstotranslate) Judicial Elections (T) Judicial Reform (T) Countries (T) Opinions (T) (T).
Story Credit
