Ish

He European Human Rights Court (ECHR) He rejected the request of the Vice President of the Catalonia Parliament, Joseph CostaWhen the judge refused to announce repeatedly before the trial of the independence process for four hours of arrest in 2021.

European judges did not agree to the complaint of Costa -Rochell in February in February, in which the members of the Katalan table were considering the opening of the Katalan Schedule, which was opened in 2019, recognizing the debate of the independence of the Balagonia.

Within the structure of this reason, it was examined by the Secretary of the table, The Yusebi Combatapatrus is brown, Costa and Rosella He did not come to testify when the judge was in need, he examined the immunity of Parliament and questioned the justice of the judicial practice.

Following that, a parallel trial was opened for refusing to appear, Ended with the beach arrest on October 27 Four hours of 2021 to complete the process instruction phase.

In November 2021, he and other members of the schedule were released for acknowledging the independence resolutions of 2019, but Costa sought his arrests, first before the High Court Judge (DSJC), and then with an Ambaro. Constitutional courtWith the argument that it is illegal and unequal.

If all the inner roads in Spain are exhausted, he went to ECHR and condemned Spain for violating Article 5 of the European Conference that regulates the arrested, as well as Section 2 (Freedom) and Section 6 (arrest warrant).

He Strasburg court He considers the DSJC to be arrested, after refusing to do so after refusing to do so after refusing to do so.

To explain it, it refers to the coastal tweets that the judges are “oppressors” and “persecutors” and that there is no “basic knowledge of dividing powers”.

In addition, ECHR believes that the arrest is not arbitrary and that the plaintiff’s parliamentary immunity has not been violated, because he has already pointed out in his own resolution last February.

In particular, there were “insufficient arguments” to conclude that the members of the schedule could not save themselves in parliamentary immunity for the crimes they investigated: because they gave their approval Parliament Discussion resolutions are contrary to the constitution.

European judges acknowledge the time when the detained is four hours, so that the accused must declare the duty of the accused, and gives the cause of the Spanish court, he justified his decision as a “last attempt” action.

In the end, the Ted “He does not consider the allegations that he is arresting is illegal (…). Complaint (…) is sufficient to conclude that the complaint (…) is obviously unfounded and rejected.”