IMELDA Tuñón Lawyer denies the link with the merchant

Lawyer Antonio Luzano Grassa, defender of IMELDA Tuñón, categorically denied that his client He had some association with an alleged merchantIt was also proposed on social media and networks. During an interview, the lawyer described these publications as data without basic or documentary evidence.

“Nothing has been adopted at all. There is no one test, one image, one conversation, nothing at all,” Luzano said.

The lawyer confirmed this The accusation was unfoundedThis is in the judicial file. There is no component related to IMELDA Tuñón Purchase activities S. Distribution of illegal materials.

The negative toxic tests of IMELDA Tuñón came out negative

In response to the accusations, the legal defense of Tuñón He presented toxic hair examination Made in the United States Laboratory, which The result was negative for any type of material.

The analysis was combined with the process of this process through the custody of his child, as well as psychological and psychological experience as well.

This evidence was crucial for that The judge decided in favor of imeldaGranting the final nursery to the son who had with Julian and changed.

The lawyer was not excluded The possibility of following up legally for moral damageBefore what Consider a campaign to discredit against her customer. He pointed out that many of the spreading data publicly affect the image and dignity of Emilda, as well as his relationship with his son.

“Here is a mother and a child referred to without evidence. He wanted to build a wrong story,” Luzano said.

Is the lawsuit part of a major conflict?

The accusations are framed in a broader conflict due to the validity of the will of Julian Vigrohoa, where Documentation has been interrogated They have Previous family conflicts revealed With the husband of the singer’s father, Marco Checkkun.

Lausano repeated that his client faced every indication with legal and scientific documents, and that general accusations, including the alleged relationship with a merchant, have no legal or judicial support.