The Civil and Criminal Room of the Andalusia’s High Court Breach a minor The girl was prevented, but not opposed or opposed, so she understood that there was no adult consent. In a sentence, DSJA is out without effect The sentence of the provincial court of Malaga Melilla One Sexual occupation From an adult to 16 year old girl in the bedroom of a house to play cards on August 2021, they attended the afternoon with other friends.
The first sentence was supposed to be proved to be sexually assaulted in spite of its manifestations, but “it (it is his aggressor),” but the DSJA eliminates those compliments, Gives credibility to those who are punished He concludes that “when he was mentally prevented from the situation”. DSJA also adds the punishment they spoke before “In mutual flirting attitude”The fact that the victim’s testimony is appropriate to question the testimony of the victim.
In addition, the child is punishing that ”Not show any negative In order to maintain a sexual relationship, or explicitly, quiet or gesture or in any other way it must be explained that there is no consent to its companion. “” It cannot be Complete and essential security The accused arrives, before having intercourse (with the victim), to know that there is no consent, ”he says. Call a friend “crying and most changed” Ask Anar Association, “Moments then a police car will appear.”
The now canceled judgment, as a result of these facts, the psychological assessment has been expressed in the slightest type of “primary symptoms,” With the expression of depression. “
The new DSJA resolution suggests that the little girl left the room “Something” and “something” with a broken faceBut he argues that it may be because of what happened “as an attack on his sexual compensation that did not agree, but” a Instant regret In practice is inevitably known by other youth, and with high probability, for her lover in the field of a small city like Melilla. “