Commentators Jose Eduardo Cardoso and Kayo Coppola discussed on Tuesday (25), at The great debate (From Monday to Friday, from 11 pm), if the defenses reach the goal during the ruling of the Public Prosecutor’s Office (PGR) for the coup attempt plan.
A The first degree of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) started today in the case of the caseWho former President Gere Bolsonaro (PL) and seven others are accused in the first nucleus.
The analysis will be resumed on Wednesday (26), with a vote on the receipt or refusal of the complaint.
Cardoso argues that there was a clear incompatibility in some defensive points.
Cardoso said: “The central point of the dispute was specifically the condemnation of (MARO) CID.
“This is, there was no uniqueness in the defenses. This is important data because it shows that during procedural instructions, which can begin if the complaint is acceptable, defenders and defendants may have interests, this may be a reality in this process,” continued.
Coppolla realizes that the purpose of defenses may be achieved.
“We are facing a deviant reflection of the award -winning institute,” said Coppola.
“On January 8, persecution lawyers revealed the arbitrary methods of PGR and the Supreme Court to condemn their political opponents: space changes in jurisprudence, forming an exception court, and producing evidence under the supervision and reduce defense.”
