Free from doubt 04/24/25 | joinery

At this time in the morning, artistic and material heritage Diego Rivera The people of Mexico inherited, in 1955, they should already be free of all speculation and suspicion. However, it is not the case, and with every minute it only passes intolerance and uncertainty.

When you read a few days ago, cultural meadows Hilda Trojillo Publishing the investigation (which can be consulted in https://hildatrujillo.blog/Where it brings pictures, documents, messages and a partial list of donor work RiveraTo expose this part of that group – which belongs to the people of Mexico and that it should be protected by the Federal Inbal and SC, according to the Federal Antiquities Law, in 1972 – he left its position (museums) incomprehensible, and has reached the role of auction. These two Ziotan and eight drawings from Ferida Kazi (1907-1954), in addition to 12 pages of the artist’s memoirs that are torn from the original, whose location is today is not certain.

I imagined that, given this investigation, the Mexico Bank (Pancico) – which will guardianship and detention of museums’ confidence in Diego Rivera and Farida Kahlo – review the matter calmly and issue a wonderful and unlikely response. Perhaps the original newspaper for Unique To clarify that no of the pages referred to. I assumed that a press conference will be held to show inventory Rivera Contribute when donating the group. Or that the ruler of Pancico, Victoria Rodriguez SijaI would like to ask for a review if there are missing pieces.

But what was confident in the investigation Trujillo – Who worked in Anahuacallli and Casa Azul museums, the first deputy director, from December 2002 to October 2009, then as a director, until October 2020 – was a document full of inflammation and inflammation.

He said, for example, that the data is provided “by third parties without jurisdiction or attribution about the group”, that they intend to “build a narration without living, in order to mislead and distort the reputation of the work of the institution”, “The person who calls for departments today through the process of penetration before he accepts it in the foreground, it is raised through the division of pressure to press confidence. A serious conflict of interests is incompatible with confidence -governing principles, but without providing evidence.

The strange thing is that the statement of the guardian (which seems to be a tantrum of anger more than an institutional document) never refers to notes Unique It does not explain whether the pieces indicated that they are extracted and placed for sale in auctions in the United States – oils Ferida in fire (1954) y Peoples Conference for Peace (1952); And graphics American freedom Y The sun looked from the window (1932), among others – in the relationship of what Rivera She donated. It also does not mention the inventory numbers that are announced or alluding to oil Flower function (1936), “The work is a lie to him RiveraIt is part of the Pancico group.

What worries this situation is that the investigation is in Hilda Only three of the 200 pages owned by the pursuit of the covenant. Does this mean that when comparing the stock in detail, more loss, absence or unconfirmed sites will be discovered? It seems to me that the time has come for the federalists and the Inbal SC, which directs Claudia Corel Y Alejandra de la PazTake this investigation with responsibility and possibly, in an extreme case, that the president Claudia Shinbom Evil and put an end to this issue.