The Electoral Court in Sao Paulo condemned the BRTB businessman for the second time this year. In this procedure, he was accused of misuse of economic power, the improper use of the media and the collection of donations and illegal resources of resources during the 2024 election campaign. The specific decision is not qualified for an eight -year and pays a fine of $ 420,000. The resolution of the decision.
The first electoral zone judge, Antonio Maria Pattino Zorers, partially supported the electoral judicial investigation (AIJE), which was proposed by PSB, Tabana Amar, the former playing of Marshal in the municipal elections. The abbreviation accused the businessman of promoting the illegal motivation for his candidacy on social networks.
The decision says, “repercussions can be found in the specified context of the elections (quantum gravity) due to these videos with the payment view of those who made Marshall video discounts in a cutting competition to reach millions of followers on their social networks (Tiktok, YouTube, Instagram, among other things).”
The judge also understood that there is an illegal spending of appeal.
“Due to the presence of a video cut by third parties, the candidate Pablo Marshall himself encouraged as a form of illegal leverage for the video scenes with its content.”
The condemnation takes place in accordance with the provisions of Article 22, Item Fourteenth, of Complementary Law No. 64/1990, and has the former candidate for the mayor, Antonia de Jesus Barbosa Fernandez, was acquitted.
The court condemned Marisal to pay the daily fine resulting from non-compliance with the AIJE 0601153-47.2024.6.26,0001 at 420,000.00 riyals
The procedure also refused to call for condemnation of the defendants to violate the polling (purchase of votes).
The judge realized that “the unrestricted investigation by the electoral public prosecution service is necessary to determine the allegedly alleged practice of criminal crimes by the owners of social networking files participating in the facts that were narrated in the initial petitions of electoral lawsuits.”
A CNN He asked Pablo Marshall, who answered that he will not put himself yet in the case.
The first condemnation
This is the second time that the businessman and former candidate for the Sao Paulo city hall and his lack of eligibility have been condemned. In February, the same judge in charge of the case, Antonio Maria Pattino Zorers, understood that Marshall provided political support to strengthen the election campaign for the advisor candidates through videos that were released on the Internet. The examination will cost $ 5,000.
“It was found that the defendant, Pablo Maralel, provided political support through the video to strengthen the election campaign for the candidates (who was not in the left parties) in exchange for donating $ 5,000.00 (five thousand rites) for his election campaign,” Zorers wrote in the first conviction.
According to the judge, Marçal used networks to publish fake news about the electoral assembly system, as well as negative electoral propaganda.
“In any case, it is not allowed, in this way, the use of the social network to publish“ false news ”about the electoral assembly system based on the party fund and the implementation of negative electoral propaganda for opponents as follows the following excerpt from the defendant.” (