The general European Revenue Agency is aimed at accelerating the evacuation of applicants, which are not allowed to be in the EU. In unexpected movement, it also opens the opportunity to build controversial prevention centers outside the block.
The revised regulator fills a vacuum in the migration and asylum used since July 2026, and EU companies report.
Asylum seekers must define lists of safe countries and third secure countries. Some of these countries can be called “return centers” with the financial assistance of the states of the EU.
“The Commission has presented a number of articles that establish legal basis for member states to create these deported centers outside the European Union, but the Commission does not participate in its administration,” says George Liborro, which includes asylum and migration policy for ‘euronevs’.
This outsourcing of the migration was supported by the right parties and was considered unacceptable by the social administration in 2018, when the rejected asylum was tried to reconsider the regulations for the first time.
“This is actually a policy, which was considered intense earlier,” says George Liborro.
The greatest representation of nationalist and conservative politicians in the European Council and the European Parliament over the past two years has led to the acceptance of powerful committees, including the European People’s Party of the Central Rights (PPE).
Javier Sarcalejos, chairman of the European Parliament’s Justice and Home Affairs Commission, is one of the people who value bilateral contracts for returning centers.
“The European Union will impose certain rules for these agreements, especially to guarantee the respect of basic rights, especially the most vulnerable in centers,” says the Spanish legislator of the BBE.
However, the Belgian Saka of the greens in the commission, Saskia Prikmont does not believe. “There will be no monitoring on fundamental rights. When we look at today, how are human rights violations everywhere, without these official centers?”
Duties and economic obstacles
The European Commission has insisted that the return centers are not the central aspect of the legislative proposal, and states that the importance of getting more cooperation of applicants is emphasized.
The rejected asylum installed the order to cooperate with the applicant officials, in which the simplifying biometric and identity information, as well as the other element of the state.
If the person does not cooperate, the consequences include reducing or denying subsidies, capturing identity documents and long entry barriers.
Long -month negotiations will be required to reach an agreement between colleges, and the final regulations may be subject to several amendments.
“On the one hand, I understand people who migrate to the other countries, because they escape from very difficult and soft situations. On the other hand, we need more rules, especially in Italy,” a Roman citizen consults in this regard by ‘euronevs’ in this regard, pointing to the difficulty of finding balance.
The EU member states signed a letter signed by 12 countries last October to point out the purpose of using a precedent change in their policy.
Advertisement“Italy, Denmark and the Netherlands are heading for political debate around Outsorcing, gathering other countries in a kind of alliance. I think these three countries may press to create centers.
As the Italy -built asylum processing center in Albania, the national and European courts may raise doubts about the legitimate nature, which is the result of a bilateral agreement. The infrastructure has been paralyzed by judicial measures, but the Melon government can now be considered the center of the center.
Check out the video here.
Journalist: Isabel Marx da Silva
AdvertisementContent Production: BILLAR MONTERO LOOPUS
Video Production: Sacharya Vigneran
Graffism: Loredena Dumitru
Editorial Integration: Ana Lazarus Bosh and Jeremy Fleming-Jones
Advertisement
