Javier DebazPresident LalicaBrought the reports of the president of the CST, Javier UripsIn ‘El Capelito’ Joseph petrololThere’s Urips commented “Dani Olemo Thank you for the error Lumps“.
Lumps He presented his version with his X account:
“The President CSD Has publicly pointed out that responsibility Dani Olemo It came from Lalika and raised the matter without skills in a monitoring commission.
As for that statement, a simple question can be asked:
Dan then gave the new licenses of the players Dani Olemo and Pao vector?
The CST resolution failed to establish any travel date, and it concludes that previous licenses were never canceled.
It is difficult to maintain this argument for a number of reasons:
Licenses were obviously issued until December 31, 2024, acknowledging the date and signed by the clubs and players.
DATE is not symbolic of that date: FC Barcelona claims licenses expired on December 31, demanding emergency precautions by the end of this year.
REST This request was denied, but as of January 1, it clearly reveals that the club considers that the players will be called.
From there, the CST’s study is “there is no obvious cancellation”, and therefore, the license is practiced, which indicates the unilateral reconstruction of a clear documentary fact: the signed contract and regulation is valid until December 31.
To decide that all this is the problem … the matter was taken to the commission.
With all corporate respect, we hope that legal funds cannot be reduced to formal debates on debate forums. The relevant thing is that when a new license is, how (or not), and administrative mechanisms are used in accordance with the own actions of the interested side.
Read
Sometimes, in an attempt to distract, it has forgotten that administrative law requires stability, motivation and legal commitment. “
