Confirm the demand for the Mrbeast product; Ever

The National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) confirmed yesterday that there is a “legal procedure against the moral person of the media circuit SA De CV – its product to American sites on YouTuber Mrbecast – due to a violation of the conditions of the permit” granted to the recording of archaeological sites in Kambesh and Youatten.

However, the agency has deleted to clarify whether YouTube has contributed to the resources to create a kind of background to help the effects of the archeology in the sites he visited, and it seems that it will be reviewed with INAH himself, as MRBECAST revealed last Sunday in his X account, in a letter in which he attributed to the statements of the cultural authorities and obtained that he would receive any request.

Einah stated, through a statement, that “the legal legal procedure against the moral person is the means Mr. Beast, I spent 100 hours exploring the Maya forestWhich will be held at Chichén Itzá, Calakmul, Becán and Chicanná – The company was notified on May 14 this year. “

This is, according to the authorities that federal law undertakes the antiquities and archaeological, technical and historical areas, and its regulations, as well as within the framework of the presidential agreement that defines the basis for protecting cultural goods and prohibiting their own attention.

In addition, the agency confirmed that YouTube “controls the goodwill of institutions that benefited from (from INAH) to make another video to promote the chocolate Mr. Beast Feast and of other, such as Walmart, 7LEVEN, Kroger and Albertsons”, which revolves around social networks.

He added, “It constitutes a violation by generating the production of another unauthorized production, for commercial purposes and the use of archaeological sites to achieve income from their contents, through digital platforms, which are prohibited in accordance with the general law of public assets.

joinery I asked about the details of the lawsuit, and a clarification before what was the case that was addressed, and what amount to which it is up and explains whether MRBASTI has contributed to the agency’s financial resources or any other case to support exploration, conservation and restoration work in the sites he visited. However, at the end of this edition, no response was received.