WASHINGTON – With a divided position, the United States Supreme Court began a discussion on President Donald Trump’s ban on citizens.
The conservative judge, Samuel Alto, estimated that national judicial decisions raise a “practical problem” because there are hundreds of provincial court judges, all of whom are “convinced that they are right.”
On January 20, the day of his investment, Trump fell on one of his most critical decrees, which is already an intense judicial battle.
Its goal is to deny this right to immigrant children in an irregular position or in the case of temporary residence, such as asylum or visas.
Trump’s decree was challenged and suspended by the Maryland and Massachusetts and Washington courts, who consider it unconstitutional.
Looking at this position, the Republican government submitted an emergency appeal before the Supreme Court.
“The courts have issued 40 global measures against the federal government,” said the legal advisor to the administration, John Sawir, who argued for Trump in the judicial session.
He added that global preventive measures go beyond the judicial faculty members and disturb the constitutional constitutional balance to separate the authorities.
He compared them to a “nuclear weapon” restricting the president.
However, it was deleted to argue or against the bottom of the matter, that is, the right to nationality.
In this regard, Progressive Judge Kitanji Brown Jackson warned of the risk of converting the judicial system “into a” system that suspends me if you can “” where “everyone must have a lawyer and a lawsuit until the government stops violating people’s rights.”
Jeremy Veginum, Prosecutor of New Jersey, one of the 23 states who submitted demands against Trump’s attempt to end citizens, admitted that there are problems with global judicial orders, but she said that there was “an unusual basis for this.”
Feigenbauum said that allowing separate judicial decisions on this issue in different countries will lead to “chaos in this field where people’s nationality explodes and stopped at the crossed borders.”
In a message about the social truth network, Trump urged the Supreme Court to fail in his favor.
The president said that citizenship by childbirth was not intended for people who take leave to become permanent citizens in the United States of America, attend their families with them, and laugh all the time “we”.
In 1898, the Supreme Court rejected that such a restrictions in this case could be applied.
Here you can access the news in real time
Learn the most viral in Facebook is heading
Read the book of columns from EXCélsior opinion
Clm
(Tagstotranslate) Donald Trump (T) Corte
Story Credit
