Citing “non -absence” punishments that a lawyer Saadgif is invented and warns the “illusions” of Italian justice AI

Florence Court on March 14 warned of the use of artificial intelligence in judicial writings following the case A lawyer who used saladgipt in the expansion of a resource. The use of this creation AI led the prosecutor to present a letter to the “non -existent” punishment of the Italian Supreme Court. In a sentence approached 20 MinutosThe Florence Warning Court on the “illusions” of artificial intelligence, which can lead to these types of errors.

The Italian court addresses the matter as follows: “The IA will have made false results later, which can be described as the so -called ‘illusion of artificial intelligence’, which occurs when the AI ​​does not have AI.

The lawyer, covered in a theft of shirts, admitted to collecting the judicial department, without properly distinguishing the results given by the Saadgift. In addition, the lawyer asked to remove the notes “recognize the shortage of verification in the data received and”.

However, the accused prosecutor said that there was misuse of the practical tool and that it should be imposed 5,000 euro fine Under Section 96 of the Italian Civil Criminal Code.

The rule illustrates the poor responsibility for practical activities with bad confidence or extreme negligence. The court concluded that when analyzing the case, The letter was done badly believed And protecting that the practical strategy was synchronous over time. In addition, the Florentine Court rejected the fines without praising that the lawyer’s performance would have caused a certain damage to the opposition party.